Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM68616

Automated Code Vulnerability Reviewing

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM68616

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-8

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

SU

Samrat Ubhe

Diploma In Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning

Zeal Polytechnic

Download Author Certificate
VM

Vivek Mane

Diploma In Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning

Zeal Polytechnic

Download Co-Author Certificate
AK

Aditya Kate

Diploma In Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning

Zeal Polytechnic

Download Co-Author Certificate
AT

Aaryan Tambe

Diploma In Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning

Zeal Polytechnic

Download Co-Author Certificate
VN

Vedant Nagane

Diploma In Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning

Zeal Polytechnic

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

DD

Dishant Dhanawade

Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning

Zeal Polytechnic

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Software vulnerabilities can introduce serious security risks in applications, making code review an essential part of the software development process. However, manual code inspection can be time-consuming, while conventional automated tools may focus on specific categories of issues and provide fragmented results. This paper proposes an automated code vulnerability reviewing framework based on a role-based multi-agent architecture integrated with GitHub. The proposed system retrieves repository information, identifies supported programming languages, examines project structure and dependencies, and prepares relevant source-code context for analysis. It coordinates three specialized agents: a Security Auditor Agent to identify potential vulnerabilities, a Software Architect Agent to examine code structure and design-related concerns, and a Review Moderator Agent to consolidate findings, remove duplicates, resolve conflicting observations, and prioritize reported issues. Reviews can be initiated automatically through supported GitHub events or manually by developers. The framework also proposes a locally executable environment with a web-based dashboard and command-line interface (CLI), allowing developers to monitor review activities and access structured reports containing issue descriptions, code locations, supporting evidence, and suggested corrections. The system is designed to provide recommendations without automatically modifying source code. This paper presents the proposed architecture, workflow, and evaluation approach; its effectiveness remains subject to future implementation and experimental validation.

KEYWORDS

Automated code vulnerability reviewing Multi-agent systems GitHub integration Artificial intelligence Large language models Software security Automated code review.

Cite This Article

Samrat Ubhe, Vivek Mane, Aditya Kate, Aaryan Tambe, Vedant Nagane, Dishant Dhanawade, "Automated Code Vulnerability Reviewing," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-8, Oct 2026.

Full Article/Conclusion

This paper presented the proposed Automated Code Vulnerability Reviewing framework, which aims to assist developers in reviewing software repositories through a GitHub-integrated, role-based multi-agent architecture. The framework combines repository analysis, source-code context preparation, and specialized review agents to examine security vulnerabilities and software architecture-related concerns. The proposed system consists of three agents: the Security Auditor Agent, the Software Architect Agent, and the Review Moderator Agent. The first two agents perform their respective analyses in parallel, while the moderator consolidates their findings, removes duplicates, handles conflicting observations, and prioritizes the reported issues. The framework also proposes a local execution environment with a web-based dashboard and command-line interface, providing developers with access to structured review reports. Unlike systems that directly modify source code, the proposed framework focuses on identifying potential issues and providing recommendations for developer verification. Its planned integration with GitHub is intended to support both manual and event-triggered code reviews. The paper also discussed the proposed methodology, evaluation approach, limitations, and security considerations. Since the framework is currently at the proposal stage, its practical effectiveness, accuracy, and performance have not yet been experimentally established. Future implementation and testing will be required to validate its capabilities and determine its usefulness in real-world software development environments.

References

[1] J. Yu, P. Liang, Y. Fu, A. Tahir, M. Shahin, C. Wang, and Y. Cai, “An insight into security code review with LLMs: Capabilities, obstacles and influential factors,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.16310, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16310 [2] R. I. T. Jensen, V. Tawosi, and S. Alamir, “Software vulnerability and functionality assessment using LLMs,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08429, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08429 [3] T. Sharanarthi and S. Polineni, “Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration for Adaptive Code Review, Debugging, and Security Analysis,” in Proc. 2025 International Conference on Mechatronics, Robotics, and Artificial Intelligence (MRAI), 2025, doi: 10.1109/MRAI65197.2025.11135756. [4] V. Belozerov, P. J. Barclay, and A. Sami, “Secure coding with AI—from detection to repair,” Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 31, art. no. 93, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s10664-026-10812-8. [5] Tree-sitter, “Introduction,” Tree-sitter Documentation. [Online]. Available: https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/. [Accessed: Oct. 29, 2026]. [6] OWASP Foundation, “OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications,” OWASP GenAI Security Project, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://genai.owasp.org/llm-top-10/

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/31/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...