Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64297
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-11
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Computer Science and Engineering
ASHOKRAO MANE GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS , VATHAR

Computer Science and Engineering
ASHOKRAO MANE GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS , VATHAR

Computer Science and Engineering
ASHOKRAO MANE GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS , VATHAR

Computer Science and Engineering
ASHOKRAO MANE GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS , VATHAR

Computer Science and Engineering
ASHOKRAO MANE GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS , VATHAR

Computer Science and Engineering
ASHOKRAO MANE GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS , VATHAR
Meetings remain one of the primary mechanisms for decision-making, collaboration, progress tracking, and knowledge exchange in academic and professional environments. However, the manual preparation of meeting minutes is time-consuming, inconsistent, and highly dependent on the attention and writing ability of a human note-taker. Important decisions, ownership details, action items, deadlines, and participant contributions may be missed when meetings are long, multi-speaker, or conducted in hybrid mode. The Automatic Meeting Minutes Generation system, named MeetMinutes in the implementation, addresses this problem by combining live meeting-room management, browser-based speech capture, transcript segmentation, Web RTC video communication, Web Socket event synchronization, and rule-based natural language processing for structured minutes generation. The proposed system enables users to register, schedule meetings, join secure video rooms, capture spoken input as transcript segments, identify speakers, detect action-oriented and decision-oriented statements, summarize speaker contributions, produce person-to-person interaction summaries, and export the generated minutes in document formats. The backend is implemented in Java with service layers for authentication, meeting-room handling, summary generation, and database synchronization. The frontend provides a browser-based dashboard, live room interface, transcript controls, summary review page, and export buttons. The system uses practical NLP heuristics such as action markers, decision markers, speaker grouping, duplicate-line filtering, sentiment tagging, and due-date inference to convert raw conversational text into usable meeting records. This paper presents the background, literature foundation, proposed methodology, architecture, UML-level design, sequence flow, activity flow, results, discussion, conclusion, and key takeaways of the project. The research emphasizes that even a lightweight and transparent NLP pipeline can provide meaningful automation for meeting documentation when it is integrated with collaboration workflows. The results indicate that the system improves documentation speed, organizes participant-wise accountability, and creates a foundation for future integration with advanced automatic speech recognition and transformer-based abstractive summarization models.
KEYWORDS
The Automatic Meeting Minutes Generation project provides a practical solution for converting live meeting conversations into structured, exportable minutes. By integrating authentication, meeting scheduling, live room management, Web RTC communication, Web Socket synchronization, speech capture, transcript storage, NLP-based extraction, and document export, the system covers the full workflow of modern meeting documentation. The research shows that useful meeting minutes do not depend only on transcription. They require participant-aware organization, action item identification, decision highlighting, summary generation, and readable output formatting. The Meet Minutes implementation addresses these needs through a transparent service-based architecture and a lightweight NLP pipeline. The generated minutes include overall summary, decisions, key points, action items, speaker summaries, person-to-person summaries, and transcript-based evidence. The system is especially suitable for academic project demonstrations, small teams, classroom discussions, project reviews, and remote collaboration scenarios. Its modular architecture allows future enhancement with machine learning models, cloud speech recognition, advanced diarization, semantic search, calendar integration, role-based access control, and analytics dashboards. In conclusion, the project successfully demonstrates an end-to-end approach to automatic meeting minutes generation. It reduces manual effort, improves accountability, and transforms unstructured meeting dialogue into organized knowledge that can be reviewed, shared, and archived.
1. Carletta, J., Ashby, S., Bourban, S., Flynn, M., Guillemot, M., Hain, T., Kadlec, J., Karaiskos, V., Kraaij, W., Kronenthal, M., Lathoud, G., Lincoln, M., Lisowska, A., McCowan, I., Post, W., Reidsma, D., and Wellner, P. (2005). The AMI Meeting Corpus: A pre-announcement. Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction. 2. McCowan, I., Carletta, J., Kraaij, W., Ashby, S., Bourban, S., Flynn, M., Guillemot, M., Hain, T., Kadlec, J., Karaiskos, V., Kronenthal, M., Lathoud, G., Lincoln, M., Lisowska, A., Post, W., Reidsma, D., and Wellner, P. (2005). The AMI Meeting Corpus. International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research. 3. Murray, G., Renals, S., and Carletta, J. (2005). Extractive summarization of meeting recordings. Proceedings of Interspeech. 4. Xie, S., and Liu, Y. (2008). Using corpus and knowledge-based similarity measure in maximum marginal relevance for meeting summarization. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 5. Purver, M., Ehlen, P., and Niekrasz, J. (2007). Detecting action items in multi-party meetings: Annotation and initial experiments. Proceedings of the SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. 6. Janin, A., Baron, D., Edwards, J., Ellis, D., Gelbart, D., Morgan, N., Peskin, B., Pfau, T., Shriberg, E., Stolcke, A., and Wooters, C. (2003). The ICSI Meeting Corpus. Proceedings of ICASSP. 7. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention Is All You Need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 8. Lewis, M., Liu, Y., Goyal, N., Ghazvininejad, M., Mohamed, A., Levy, O., Stoyanov, V., and Zettlemoyer, L. (2020). BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension. ACL. 9. Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., Saleh, M., and Liu, P. J. (2020). PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarization. ICML. 10. Jurafsky, D., and Martin, J. H. (2023). Speech and Language Processing. Draft textbook, Stanford University.
Publication Date
5/29/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...