Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM23162
Volume:
7 |
6 |
Jun 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Medical publications continue to be a prolific source of information at an astronomical rate, with the amount of information added every day. Increasing amounts of information are being processed through systematic reviews. EBM relies on them as a fundamental tool. In this paper, we demonstrate that automatic text classification can speed up the reviewing process for medical topics. we propose a per-question classification strategy that exploits the specific protocol of a systematic review. This study shows that when integrating the classifier into the review workflow, the per-question method outperforms the global method. By locating and investigating the most recent applicable research, medical systematic reviews present thorough responses to specific concerns within an admittedly restricted field of expertise. A group of experts in the field must evaluate numerous articles as part of this procedure in order to discover the suitable instances, which typically takes a lot of time and effort. Encouraging this method is our aim. employing automated tools. A few weeks ago, it was trendy to use text methodologies for classification to partially automate the screening process by giving the panel of experts decisions support, thereby lowering the time and labour demands. In the present article, we make an impact on this field of research by performing a thorough set of categorization of text tests on a corpus created with an analysis, we make a contribution to this field of research in this paper.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/23/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...