Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM52396
Volume:
9 |
9 |
Sep 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The rapid development of agentic AI, where autonomous agents act instead of humans need to align with human values to attain their objectives, despite initially having limited knowledge of those values.Using traditional reinforcement learning in agentic AI may result in incorrectly formulated reward functions resulting in unsafe behaviours. Furthermore RL agents encounter difficulties in sampling, reward misalignment, and lack of cross-domain generalization. In this paper, we introduce Bayesian Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learning (Bayesian CIRL). This is a new method that uses a latent variable with a probabilistic belief about the distribution of the human reward function. Unlike the traditional IRL, Bayesian CIRL treats value alignment as a cooperative game, where the agent updates its beliefs by observing human actions and also plans its own actions to maximize the uncertain joint reward. This approach allows adaptive cooperation through active learning. It also transfer the learned behaviour to reduce uncertainty over human inclinations. Experimental tests show that Bayesian CIRL offers more robust and accurate value alignment than standard IRL algorithms. It handles ambiguity better and allows for reliable interaction between humans and agents. This framework provides a clear way to introduce agentic AI systems that align with human ethics and societal expectations.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
3/8/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...