Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM56806
Volume:
10 |
2 |
Feb 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Economic behavior in the past decade has repeatedly diverged from the predictions of standard economic models built on assumptions of stable preferences, perfect information, and rational optimization. From persistent cash usage despite widespread digital payment infrastructure to retail investors amplifying financial volatility through excessive trading, real-world outcomes increasingly reveal the limits of purely incentive-based explanations. This paper situates such patterns within the broader transformation of the global economy and argues that behavioral economics offers a more realistic and operationally useful framework for understanding them. Rather than presenting a comprehensive survey of behavioral theory, the analysis focuses selectively on behavioral mechanisms—bounded rationality, loss aversion, present bias, social preferences, and framing—as they appear in contemporary economic settings, with particular emphasis on India. Drawing on policy experiences, market behavior, and empirical evidence from India and comparable economies, the paper demonstrates that behavioral frictions are not transitional imperfections but structural features of modern economic systems. The analysis further shows that policy effectiveness increasingly depends on institutional design choices that interact with human cognition rather than on incentives alone. The paper concludes that integrating behavioral insights into economic governance is not an optional refinement but a practical necessity for achieving stability, inclusion, and long-term welfare in both emerging and advanced economies.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/23/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...