Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM57246
Volume:
10 |
3 |
Mar 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Behavioral finance challenges the traditional assumption of rational decision-making in financial markets by emphasizing psychological influences on investor behavior. This study empirically examines the influence of three major cognitive biases—overconfidence, herding, and anchoring—on investor behavior and financial market trends. The research design used was both descriptive and analytical. A standardized questionnaire distributed via Google Forms was used to gather primary data from 150 investors. SPSS software was used to evaluate the gathered data. Regression analysis, correlation analysis, and reliability analysis (Cronbach’s Alpha) were among the statistical techniques used to investigate the connections between investor decision-making and behavioral biases. The results suggest that while overconfidence had a mixed effect and worse reliability, herding and anchoring biases had a statistically significant favorable impact on investor behavior. The findings support the notion that psychological biases significantly influence market movements and investing choices. The study emphasizes the value of financial literacy in reducing irrational investment behavior and adds empirical evidence from retail investors to the body of literature on behavioral finance.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/2/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...