Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65262
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Computer Application
C.M.P Degree College, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India
Department of Commercemputer Application
C.M.P Degree College, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India
Current systems that produce multi-modal content, including video and audio, often suffer from missing objects, weak links between meanings, poor coordination of the visual and sound elements, etc. These problems often occur because the visuals and the audio are developed separately, resulting in a mismatch between what you see and what you hear. To address these challenges, we introduce SG-WORLD V2, a planning-first framework for semantic reasoning and coordination in structured world simulations. SG-WORLD V2 does not create video or audio directly, but rather a semantic blueprint. It translates natural language into machine-understandable representations, reasons on the Universal Scene Graph (USG), adds a Quantification Rule to keep track of the items requested, and employs Deterministic Pre-Temporal Synchronization (DPTS) to synchronize audio and visual events during planning. The system also has a self-correcting mechanism that checks semantic consistency before producing outputs. The framework is tested on 54 different prompts including object layouts, spatial relations, actions and synchronized audio-video scenarios. The results show that the object tracking, relationship maintenance and logically consistent planning are performed well. Overall, SG-WORLD V2 provides a transparent and reliable semantic planning paradigm, which could be a stepping stone for future video and audio generation systems, and also contribute to consistency and alignment among modalities.
KEYWORDS
Behavioral finance provides a full explanation for deviations from rational investment behavior. The literature review of the study shows that retail investors are highly affected by psychological biases such as Overconfidence, Loss Aversion, Herding, Anchoring, Confirmation Bias, Representativeness and Mental Accounting. These biases influence perception of risk, diversification of portfolio, frequency of trade and investment performance. Behavioral biases can be detected and corrected to improve investment performance and make financial markets more efficient. Rational investment behaviour of retail investors is a key to investor education, financial literacy programmes and awareness of psychological influences.
1) Sharma, D. R., Adhikari, M., & Khatun, I. (2024). Behavioral biases of individual investors' decision-making in emerging markets: A mediation approach. Journal of Emerging Management Studies, 2(2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.3126/jems.v2i2.74499 2) Aqham, A. A., Endaryati, E., Subroto, V. K., & Kusumajaya, R. A. (2024). Behavioral biases in investment decisions: A mixed-methods study on retail investors in emerging markets. Journal of Management and Informatics, 3(3), 568–586. https://doi.org/10.51903/jmi.v3i3.63 3) El Asri, R., & Messaoudi, A. (2024). Behavioral biases influencing investment decision making in emergent markets: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics, 5(6), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11425398 4) Shah, B., & Butt, K. A. (2024). Heuristic biases and investment decision-making of stock market investors: A review paper. Vision. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629231220985 5) Sharma, A., & Prajapati, B. (2024). Behavioral biases and their effect on investment decisions: A systematic review. International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.47392/IRJAEM.2024.0487 6) Paul, H. I. S., & Sundaram, N. (2023). Behavioral biases and their influence on investment decision-making: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i4.904 7) Kumar, S., Goyal, N., et al. (2023). A systematic review on behavioral biases affecting individual investment decisions. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 16(3), 448–476. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-05-2022-0095 8) Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118364 9) Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556400 10) Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486
Publication Date
6/22/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...