Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67959
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-8
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Management
Lovely professional University
Management
Lovely professional University
Management
Lovely professional University
Management
Lovely professional University
Management
Lovely professional University
Hindustan Zinc Limited presents a useful governance question: can strong operating performance coexist with a board that falls short of the applicable independence rule? We examine its annual reports and governance disclosures from FY2021 to FY2025, with FY2025 comparisons to Hindalco Industries and National Aluminium Company. Revenue increased from ₹22,629 crore to ₹34,083 crore, while the company reported ₹10,353 crore in FY2025 profit after tax. Yet its nine-member board had only three independent directors on 31 March 2025. The annual report identifies a shortfall under SEBI Regulation 17(1)(b), and discloses ₹36.60 lakh in FY2025 exchange penalties, excluding GST. Economic value added also fell from ₹8,553 crore to ₹4,900 crore across the observation period. These facts establish a tension between the firm’s cash-generating operations and the independent oversight of decisions about cash. They do not, by themselves, prove that dividends or related-party transactions harmed minority shareholders. We recommend a board composition plan that actually satisfies the 50% rule, clearer disclosure of capital allocation tests and related-party review, and measurable reporting on ethics and community outcomes.
KEYWORDS
HZL’s FY2025 profitability is substantial, but profitability alone cannot settle whether governance oversight is sufficient. The five-year records show growth in revenue and operating cash, large dividends, a much smaller book equity base and lower company-reported EVA at the endpoints. The clearest governance fact is the disclosed three-of-nine independent board, against a minimum of half under the rule triggered by its chairperson’s relationship to the promoter. A sound response starts with a composition plan that works mathematically, followed by transparent reviews of distributions, related-party terms and ethics outcomes. These actions can be assessed in subsequent filings, without presuming misconduct from the current descriptive evidence.
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. Bertrand, M., Mehta, P., & Mullainathan, S. (2002). Ferreting out tunneling: An application to Indian business groups. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 121–148. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 81–112. Crane, A., Matten, D., Glozer, S., & Spence, L. (2019). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. Freeman, R. E. (2015). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1984). Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management, 20(4), 101–112. Hindalco Industries Limited. (2025). Integrated annual report 2024–25. Hindalco Industries Limited. Hindustan Zinc Limited. (2025). Integrated annual report 2024–25. https://www.hzlindia.com/uploads/Integrated_Annual_Report_2024_25_1_0dd496e1e2.pdf Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Publication Date
10/14/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...