Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM62002

Beyond Retention Metrics: How Psychological Safety and Inclusive Leadership Shape Employee Engagement in Hybrid Work Environments

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM62002

Volume:

10 |

4 |

April 2026

Pages:

1-9

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM62002

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

DNS

Dr Nisha Solanki

Bachelor of Business Administration

Maharaja Surajmal Institute

Download Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

As organizations increasingly adopt hybrid work models, traditional retention-focused HR metrics are proving insufficient to capture the full spectrum of employee engagement. This study investigates how psychological safety and inclusive leadership practices collectively influence employee engagement in hybrid work environments. Drawing on Social Exchange Theory and the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, we propose and test a conceptual framework in which psychological safety mediates the relationship between inclusive leadership and employee engagement. Using a mixed-methods approach — encompassing a survey of 312 professionals across diverse hybrid-work organizations and 18 semi-structured interviews — the findings reveal that psychological safety is a significant predictor of engagement, and that inclusive leadership behaviors substantially amplify this effect. Furthermore, engagement in hybrid contexts is shaped by perceptions of fairness, belonging, and access to informal communication channels. The study contributes actionable insights for HR practitioners and calls for a paradigm shift from lagging retention indicators to leading engagement-centered frameworks. Implications for HR policy, leadership training, and future research are discussed.

KEYWORDS

Keywords: psychological safety inclusive leadership employee engagement hybrid work human resource management organizational behavior

Cite This Article

Dr Nisha Solanki, "Beyond Retention Metrics: How Psychological Safety and Inclusive Leadership Shape Employee Engagement in Hybrid Work Environments," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1-9, April 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM62002

Full Article/Conclusion

This study demonstrates that moving beyond retention metrics requires organizations to invest in the relational and cultural conditions that drive engagement — chiefly, psychological safety and inclusive leadership. In hybrid work environments, where physical distance can quickly translate into psychological distance, these constructs are not soft imperatives but strategic necessities. Leaders who are open, accessible, and equitable in their inclusion behaviors create the safety conditions under which employees are willing and able to bring their full selves to work — regardless of where that work takes place. HR scholars and practitioners alike must elevate engagement-centered, safety-driven frameworks as the new standard for measuring and managing the twenty-first-century workforce.  

References

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley. Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250–260. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Wiley. Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113–165. Gratton, L. (2021). How to do hybrid right. Harvard Business Review, 99(3), 66–74. Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. Hollander, E. P. (2009). Inclusive leadership: The essential leader-follower relationship. Routledge. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., & Kedharnath, U. (2018). Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 190–203. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

4/30/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

3

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...