Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62016
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
independent researcher
independent researcher
Design pedagogy is frequently perceived through its structured elements - such as studio assignments, critiques, and formal curricula. Nonetheless, this perspective greatly oversimplifies the intricate and multifaceted ways in which design students truly acquire knowledge. This paper contends that a significant aspect of design education unfolds through what is known as the hidden curriculum - a web of informal, social, and cultural influences that mold students' identities, aesthetic sensibilities, and career paths. This paper introduces the Theory of Informal Design Socialization, positioning the hidden curriculum not as a peripheral phenomenon but as a central mechanism through which design legitimacy is produced and reproduced. Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of cultural capital, Michel Foucault’s notion of disciplinary power, and practice-based learning theories, the paper examines how peer influence, studio culture, competition, networking, and aesthetic bias collectively operate as an invisible yet powerful pedagogical system. Through an expanded analytical discussion, including the Indian design education context, the paper demonstrates that informal systems often outweigh formal instruction in shaping outcomes. It further develops a conceptual framework - the Hidden Curriculum Matrix - to explain how visibility, validation, and identity formation interact in a self-reinforcing loop. The paper concludes by proposing institutional and policy-level interventions to make these invisible systems visible and more equitable.
KEYWORDS
The hidden curriculum is not peripheral to design education; it is central to how students learn, identify, and succeed. By theorizing Informal Design Socialization and mapping the Hidden Curriculum Matrix, this paper demonstrates that learning extends far beyond the studio brief. A future-oriented pedagogy must therefore confront and redesign these informal systems, making them transparent, equitable, and aligned with pluriversal design futures.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum. Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Publication Date
4/30/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...