Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM59438
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The rapid adoption of large language models in real-world applications has raised critical concerns regarding embedded biases in their representations and outputs [1], [2]. These biases, often inherited from training data, can influence decision-making systems in subtle yet impactful ways. This study presents a comprehensive framework for detecting and analyzing bias in transformer-based language models using both semantic similarity measures and internal representation analysis. Multiple models, including BERT, RoBERTa, DistilBERT, Sentence-BERT, and selected large language models, are eval- uated across standardized bias benchmarks [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. The approach combines embedding-based techniques such as Word Embedding Association Tests with layer-wise inspection of hidden states to identify how bias manifests across different architectural depths [9], [10]. The results highlight that bias is not uniformly distributed across models or layers, with certain intermediate representations exhibiting stronger associations. Furthermore, differences beten encoder-based and generative models suggest distinct bias prop- agation mechanisms [11], [2]. This work contributes a unified pipeline for bias evaluation and offers insights into improving fairness in modern language systems.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/3/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...