Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM57223
Volume:
10 |
3 |
Mar 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The rapid spread of misinformation on social media, particularly Twitter, poses major problems to information reliability and public trust. This paper includes a complete comparative examination of six deep learning models such as RNN, CNN, BERT, GRU, LSTM, and a suggested BiLSTM Attention Transformer (BiLAT) assessed across three benchmark datasets: Fake and Real News, FakeNewsNet, and ISOT Fabricated News. We systematically test five hyperparameter optimisation methods (Grid Search (GS), Random Search (RS), Bayesian Optimisation (BO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), and BOHB) to see how they affect model performance. Results reveal that transformer-based architectures greatly outperform traditional models, with BiLAT obtaining state-of-the-art performance, including 99% accuracy on FakeNewsNet under BOHB optimization. BOHB consistently gives the best performance gains across all models and datasets, with an accuracy boost of 2–5% over traditional optimisation methods. The findings suggest that integrating advanced transformer topologies with efficient hyperparameter optimization considerably boosts the ability to grasp linguistic intricacies inherent in disinformation. This paper shows the importance of architectural design and optimization technique in constructing effective, scalable fake news detection systems for social media contexts.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/2/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...