Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65601
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-10
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
D.Y. Patil College of Engineering, Akurdi
Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
D.Y. Patil College of Engineering, Akurdi
Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
D.Y. Patil College of Engineering, Akurdi
Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
D.Y. Patil College of Engineering, Akurdi
Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
D.Y. Patil College of Engineering, Akurdi
Detecting brain tumors in their early stages is a crucial task in medical diagnostics, as it significantly improves patient outcomes. While biopsy remains the definitive diagnostic technique, it is invasive and surgically demanding. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the most widely adopted non-invasive modality for diagnosis; however, manual interpretation is labor-intensive and subject to inter-observer variability. This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of various computational intelligence techniques, including classical machine learning (ML) and modern deep learning (DL), to automate and enhance the accuracy of brain tumor detection and classification from MRI images. We examine the performance of multiple models, including custom 2D Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), convolutional auto-encoders, U-Net architectures with pretrained backbones, and several fine-tuned transfer learning families: VGG16 / VGG19, ResNet-18 / ResNet-50 / ResNet-101, and the EfficientNet-B0 through B4 variants, as well as Xception. These are benchmarked against traditional classifiers such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). Core methodologies, including image preprocessing, data augmentation, oversampling-based class balancing, and feature extraction using the Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), are discussed in depth. Our implemented ResNet-50 pipeline, trained on an oversampled subset of the TCGA-LGG MRI collection with fine-tuned dense classification heads, achieved a test accuracy of 90.97%, confirming that mid-capacity residual networks remain highly competitive under modest compute budgets. Results consistently show that deep learning models achieve superior performance, with reported accuracies reaching 97.5%, 97.93%, and 98.73% for advanced architectures. These findings highlight the transformative potential of ML and DL to create reliable, scalable, and efficient diagnostic tools that support clinicians and improve patient care.
KEYWORDS
This comprehensive review of recent research demonstrates that machine learning and deep learning have made significant strides in the automated detection, classification, and segmentation of brain tumors from MRI images. Deep learning models—specifically Convolutional Neural Networks, fine-tuned pre-trained architectures like Xception and VGG16, and segmentation-focused models like the U-Net—consistently deliver high accuracy and robust performance, often exceeding 97% [1], [2], [3], [5], [8]. The superiority of deep learning over traditional machine learning approaches is clearly established, with performance improvements of over 11 percentage points in classification accuracy [8]. Transfer learning has emerged as a particularly effective strategy, enabling the development of highly accurate models with reduced training time and data requirements. Of all the figures surveyed here, Xception's 98.73% weighted accuracy is the ceiling for brain tumor classification [1]. For segmentation tasks, the U-Net architecture, especially when enhanced with pre-trained encoders like VGG19, achieves exceptional performance with Dice Coefficients exceeding 0.96 [5]. This level of accuracy approaches human expert performance and demonstrates the potential for these systems to provide reliable automated tumor delineation. However, several challenges remain before these technologies can be widely adopted in clinical practice. Data dependency, model interpretability, computational costs, class imbalance, and the need for extensive clinical validation are significant hurdles that must be addressed [4], [5]. The "black-box" nature of deep learning models, in particular, poses a barrier to clinical trust and adoption. Future work should focus on addressing these current limitations through several key directions: curating larger and more diverse multi-institutional datasets, developing methods to improve model interpretability and explainability through techniques like Grad-CAM and attention mechanisms, exploring multimodal and 3D volumetric approaches to capture richer spatial and tissue information, implementing federated learning to enable privacy-preserving collaborative model development, and most critically, validating these models in real-world clinical settings to ensure their seamless integration into existing healthcare workflows [1], [3], [4], [7]. The integration of automated brain tumor detection and localization systems into clinical practice has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes by enabling earlier detection, more accurate diagnosis, reducing inter-observer variability, and supporting radiologists in making more informed decisions. Continued innovation in this field promises to further enhance the role of AI in medical imaging and personalized medicine, ultimately contributing to better patient care and improved survival rates for brain tumor patients.
[1] A. Amarnath, A. Al Bataineh, and J. A. Hansen, "Transfer-Learning Approach for Enhanced Brain Tumor Classification in MRI Imaging," BioMedInformatics, vol. 4, pp. 1745-1756, 2024. [2] W. Ayadi, W. Elhamzi, I. Charfi, and M. Atri, "Deep CNN for Brain Tumor Classification," Neural Processing Letters, vol. 53, pp. 671-700, 2021. [3] S. Deepak and P. M. Ameer, "Brain Tumor Classification Using Deep CNN Features via Transfer Learning," Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 111, p. 103345, 2019. [4] G. S. Tandel, M. Biswas, O. G. Kakde, A. Tiwari, H. S. Suri, et al., "A Review on a Deep Learning Perspective in Brain Cancer Classification," Cancers, vol. 11, p. 111, 2019. [5] A. B. Abdusalomov, M. Mukhiddinov, and T. K. Whangbo, "Brain Tumor Detection Based on Deep Learning Approaches and Magnetic Resonance Imaging," Cancers, vol. 15, p. 4172, 2023. [6] Ö. Polat and C. Güngen, "Classification of Brain Tumors from MR Images Using Deep Transfer Learning," Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 77, pp. 7236-7252, 2021. [7] M. M. Islam, P. Barua, M. Rahman, T. Ahammed, L. Akter, and J. Uddin, "Transfer Learning Architectures with Fine-Tuning for Brain Tumor Classification Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging," Healthcare Analytics, vol. 4, p. 100270, 2023. [8] S. K. Mathivanan, S. Sonaimuthu, S. Murugesan, H. Rajadurai, B. D. Shivahare, and M. A. Shah, "Employing Deep Learning and Transfer Learning for Accurate Brain Tumor Detection," Scientific Reports, vol. 14, p. 7232, 2024. [9] M. Tan and Q. V. Le, "EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks," Proc. 36th Int. Conf. Machine Learning (ICML), 2019. [10] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, "Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition," IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016.
Publication Date
6/28/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...