Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM66885

Building Digital Trust: The Role of Reputation Systems and Consumer Feedback in Platform Ecosystems

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM66885

Volume:

10 |

8 |

Aug 2026

Pages:

1-10

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM66885

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Debapriya Banerjee

Debapriya Banerjee

MANAGEMENT

IMS BUSINESS SCHOOL

Download Author Certificate
RAJARSHI CHAKRABORTY

RAJARSHI CHAKRABORTY

MANAGEMENT

IMS BUSINESS SCHOOL

Download Co-Author Certificate
AINDRILA CHAKRABORTY

AINDRILA CHAKRABORTY

MANAGEMENT

IMS BUSINESS SCHOOL

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

DAR

DR. APARAJITA ROY

MANAGEMENT

INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDY

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Digital trust is a key driver of interactions in platform ecosystems, where reputation systems and consumer feedback reduce uncertainty and shape user behaviour. While prior research highlights the influence of online reviews, credibility, and platform-based trust on user intentions and e-commerce adoption, studies often examine these elements in isolation, leaving a gap in integrating behavioural, technological, and ecosystem-level perspectives, particularly in emerging markets like India. This study addresses this gap by identifying key trust-building mechanisms and examining the influence of consumer feedback on user perceptions using a qualitative approach based on systematic literature synthesis and thematic analysis. The study develops an integrated Stimulus–Organism–Response (S-O-R) and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) framework, where stimuli include ratings, reviews, and feedback credibility; organism factors comprise perceived usefulness, ease of use, trust, and risk; and responses involve usage, engagement, and loyalty, with governance mechanisms acting as moderating and mediating factors. Findings reveal that trust serves as a critical bridge between feedback systems and technology acceptance, as credible reviews, strong e-service quality, and transparent governance enhance perceived usefulness, reduce risk, and foster a self-reinforcing trust loop, leading to sustained engagement and platform success; these findings imply that platform managers should prioritize review authenticity, service quality, and robust governance to strengthen user trust and long-term performance.

KEYWORDS

Digital Trust; Reputation Systems; Platform Ecosystems; Consumer Feedback

Cite This Article

Debapriya Banerjee, RAJARSHI CHAKRABORTY, AINDRILA CHAKRABORTY, DR. APARAJITA ROY, "Building Digital Trust: The Role of Reputation Systems and Consumer Feedback in Platform Ecosystems," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1-10, Aug 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM66885

Full Article/Conclusion

Digital trust is a key driver of success in platform ecosystems, shaping user interaction, engagement, and decision-making. Reputation systems and consumer feedback reduce uncertainty by providing reliable information, enabling informed choices. The integration of the S-O-R and TAM models offers a comprehensive framework that captures both technological and behavioural aspects of trust formation.   Trust is dynamic and evolves through ongoing interactions between platform features, user perceptions, and governance mechanisms. Factors such as perceived usefulness, ease of use, feedback credibility, and transparency collectively influence its development. Therefore, platforms must ensure authentic reviews, high service quality, and strong governance to build and sustain user confidence.   Future research should focus on empirical validation, cross-cultural analysis, and advanced modelling to further test and refine this framework across diverse digital contexts.

References

1.                    Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. 2.                    Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134. 3.                    Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness and ease of use. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. 4.                    Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. 5.                    Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press. 6.                    Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E., & Kuwabara, K. (2000). Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 45–48. 7.                    Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). Effect of word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354. 8.                    Filieri, R. (2015). What makes online reviews helpful? Tourism Management, 46, 126– 138. 9.                    Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful review? MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185–200. 10.                 Kim, J., & Lennon, S. (2013). Effects of reputation and website quality. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(1), 68–82.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

8/21/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...