Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68373
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Computer Science
SVKM NMIMS

Computer Science
SVKM NMIMS

Computer Science
SVKM NMIMS
Computer Science
SVKM NMIMS
Small and mid-sized manufacturers often track machine performance and workforce records in separate tools, and reconciling the two is slow and error-prone. This paper presents ByteMatrix, a web-based Internet-of-Things (IoT) platform that brings machine telemetry, Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE), production logging, energy tracking, alarms, and an HR subsystem (shift scheduling, attendance, and Indian statutory payroll) into one application. The system has three tiers: a React/TypeScript front end, an Express.js REST API that streams live data over Server-Sent Events (SSE), and a MongoDB store accessed through Mongoose. A simulator generates sensor readings every 5 s by default, a status engine classifies each machine as running, idle, down, or under maintenance from the time since its last production event, and a backfill service seeds hourly trend data at startup. The payroll engine handles EPF (12%), ESI (0.75%), Professional Tax, and TDS under both the new and old tax regimes. Access is controlled through eight roles and a custom HMAC-SHA256 token scheme. We checked the OEE and payroll logic by code review and hand calculation, because no live database was available during evaluation. The results suggest that an open-source stack can cover the operational and HR needs of small Indian plants without a commercial MES license.
KEYWORDS
We presented ByteMatrix, a web-based IoT platform that handles manufacturing monitoring and workforce management together. It shows that a single open-source full-stack application can meet the main operational and HR needs of small and medium Indian plants without a proprietary MES license. The main technical results are a configurable IoT simulator with bounded random-walk sensor models, an OEE engine based on ISO 22400-2, a payroll engine for EPF, ESI, PT, and TDS under both tax regimes, an automatic status classifier, a deterministic history backfill, and an eight-role RBAC model with plant-scoped isolation. Four directions for future work stand out. Real hardware integration through MQTT or OPC-UA adapters is the first priority for production use. Password hashing with bcrypt or Argon2 has to be added before any real use. The payroll engine should be extended to gratuity and bonus. And the in-process EventEmitter should be replaced with Redis Pub/Sub so that the server can run in a Node.js cluster or under container orchestration. A further extension is machine-learning anomaly detection on the telemetry stream, aimed at predictive maintenance by spotting sensor patterns that come before equipment failure.
[1] R. Y. Zhong, X. Xu, E. Klotz, and S. T. Newman, “Intelligent manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0: A review,” Engineering, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 616–630, 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015. [2] S. Jeschke, C. Brecher, H. Song, and D. B. Rawat, Eds., Industrial Internet of Things: Cybermanufacturing Systems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017. [3] R. R. Pinheiro, F. Romero, and A. Zuperria, “Comparative study of open-source MES solutions for manufacturing SMEs,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 38, pp. 1502–1509, 2019. [4] J. Wang, L. Zhang, L. Duan, and R. X. Gao, “A new paradigm of cloud-based predictive maintenance for intelligent manufacturing,” J. Intell. Manuf., vol. 28, pp. 1125–1137, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10845-015-1066-0. [5] S. Nakajima, Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance. Cambridge, MA, USA: Productivity Press, 1988. [6] P. Muchiri and L. Pintelon, “Performance measurement using overall equipment effectiveness (OEE): Literature review and practical application discussion,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 46, no. 13, pp. 3517–3535, 2008, doi: 10.1080/00207540601146498. [7] Automation Systems and Integration—Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Manufacturing Operations Management—Part 2: Definitions and Descriptions, ISO 22400-2:2014, 2014. [8] A. Kulkarni, S. Joshi, and R. Patil, “Automated statutory compliance in Indian factory payroll systems,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Adv. Comput., Commun. Informat. (ICACCI), 2018. [9] B. Tudorica and C. Bucur, “A comparison between several NoSQL databases with comments for MOD db,” in Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Control Syst. Sci. (CSCS), 2011, doi: 10.1109/CSCS.2011.5948461. [10] H. Kaur and G. Singh, “Real-time industrial dashboard design using React.js and WebSocket integration,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 175, no. 12, pp. 14–19, 2020.
Publication Date
10/28/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...