Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68560
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-3
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Artificial Intelligence And Machine Learning
Zeal Polytechnic, Pune
Artificial Intelligence And Machine Learning
Zeal Polytechnic, Pune
Artificial Intelligence And Machine Learning
Zeal Polytechnic, Pune
Artificial Intelligence And Machine Learning
Zeal Polytechnic, Pune
Artificial Intelligence And Machine Learning
Zeal Polytechnic, Pune
Computer-aided design (CAD) tools are powerful but demanding: faults are found late, hand-drawn intent is ambiguous, teamwork is awkward, and design history is rarely captured in reusable form. This paper surveys the techniques that underpin CADGENIUS, a proposed AI-assisted CAD companion built on five features: DesignGuard AI, Smart Sketch Clarification, CAD Sync Talk, Voice and Visual Commands, and AI Record Tracker. We describe the review approach, present a layered architecture and workflow, review the literature behind each feature, and compare the features on maturity, data needs, real-time suitability and explainability. The synthesis shows that deterministic geometry checks, learned models and language-model orchestration are complementary, and that provenance logging is the feature that ties the others together. Limitations and open problems are also discussed.
KEYWORDS
This paper surveyed the research behind CADGENIUS and its five features, and proposed a layered architecture and workflow that connects them. The review suggests a hybrid strategy: deterministic checks for correctness, learned models for flexibility, language models for orchestration and explanation, and provenance logging as a shared backbone. Future work includes building a prototype, evaluating each feature with designers on realistic parts, creating a benchmark for conversational CAD, and studying on-premise deployment for sensitive designs.
[1] K. D. D. Willis et al., “Fusion 360 Gallery: A dataset and environment for programmatic CAD construction from human design sequences,” ACM Trans. Graph., vol. 40, no. 4, Art. 54, 2021. [2] R. Wu, C. Xiao, and C. Zheng, “DeepCAD: A deep generative network for computer-aided design models,” in Proc. IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV), 2021, pp. 6772-6782. [3] A. Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you need,” in Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), 2017, pp. 5998-6008. [4] Y. Ganin, S. Bartunov, Y. Li, E. Keller, and S. Saliceti, “Computer-aided design as language,” in Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), 2021. [5] T. B. Brown et al., “Language models are few-shot learners,” in Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), 2020. [6] S. Joshi and T. C. Chang, “Graph-based heuristics for recognition of machined features from a 3D solid model,” Comput.-Aided Des., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 58-66, 1988. [7] P. Lewis et al., “Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks,” in Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), 2020. [8] A. Seff, Y. Ovadia, W. Zhou, and R. P. Adams, “SketchGraphs: A large-scale dataset for modeling relational geometry in computer-aided design,” in ICML Workshop Object-Oriented Learn., 2020. [9] D. Ha and D. Eck, “A neural representation of sketch drawings,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), 2018. [10] A. Dosovitskiy et al., “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR), 2021.
Publication Date
10/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
9
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...