CampusSecure: AI That Protects Access

Access control has evolved significantly over time, but the challenges it aims to address have also become more complex. While traditional models like RBAC continue to play an important role, they are no longer sufficient on their own. This review shows that modern systems require a combination of structured access control, contextual decision-making, and behavioral analysis. Each of these components addresses a different limitation, and together they provide a more comprehensive solution. In academic systems, where multiple users interact with sensitive data, this becomes even more important. A layered approach not only improves security, but also makes the system more resilient to different types of threats. Looking ahead, further improvements are likely to come from better integration of these approaches, along with advancements in machine learning and real-time analysis. However, the key idea remains the same — access control should not be static, but adaptive. Overall, AI-driven multi-layer access control represents a critical step toward building secure, scalable, and resilient systems in an increasingly complex digital landscape.  

[1]            D. Ferraiolo and D. Kuhn, "Role-Based Access Controls," 1992. [2]            R. Sandhu et al., "Role-Based Access Control Models," IEEE Computer, 1996. [3]            M. Bishop, Computer Security: Art and Science, 2018. [4]            V. C. Hu et al., Guide to Attribute Based Access Control, NIST SP 800-162. [5]            OWASP Foundation, Application Security Verification Standard. [6]            M. Jones et al., JSON Web Token (JWT), RFC 7519. [7]            PostgreSQL Documentation, Row-Level Security Policies. [8]            OpenID Foundation, OpenID Connect Core. [9]            Google Cloud, Zero Trust Security Model. [10]            Microsoft Security, Zero Trust Architecture.