Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM47487
Volume:
9 |
5 |
May 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This article, attempts a philosophical inspection of Amartya Sen’s ‘capability approach’ as the unique outline for comprehending justice. Sen’s ‘capability approach’ is a departure or shift from traditional paradigms that prioritise resources or utility, as it underscores the actual freedoms that individuals possess to accomplish the lives they value. This paper critically evaluates the philosophical underpinnings of Sen’s concept of justice, investigating its approach to the challenges of human development, poverty, and inequality. It will also evaluate the significance of the ‘capability approach’ in comparison to other mainstream theories of justice, particularly those proposed by John Rawls, by examining its fundamental principles, including its emphasis on individual capabilities and its rejection of a fixed metric of justice. Furthermore, this inquiry explores the implications of Sen’s methodology for contemporary discussions regarding public policy and global justice. The paper endeavours to promote a more profound comprehension of justice that is more in accordance with human diversity and real-world circumstances by means of this investigation, thereby providing a more pragmatic and ethically sensitive framework for assessing social arrangements.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/4/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...