Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68307
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Computer Engineering
Sandip Institute of Technology and Research Centre
Department of Computer Engineering
Sandip Institute of Technology and Research Centre
Department of Computer Engineering
Sandip Institute of Technology and Research Centre
Department of Computer Engineering
Sandip Institute of Technology and Research Centre
Department of Computer Engineering
Sandip Institute of Technology and Research Centre
With the growing proliferation of IoT devices, intelligent sensing systems, and latency-sensitive applications, edge computing has emerged as an important computing paradigm for processing workloads closer to end users. However, task scheduling across heterogeneous edge nodes remains challenging because of varying workload characteristics, resource constraints, latency requirements, and the carbon intensity of electricity sources. Existing scheduling approaches commonly emphasize execution time, resource utilization, or energy efficiency, while carbon emissions are often considered separately. This paper presents a structured review of recent research on reinforcement-learning-based scheduling, energy-aware task management, workload clustering, and carbon-aware task offloading in edge computing. Based on the reviewed literature, key limitations are identified in carbon-intensity awareness, state-space scalability, joint optimization of latency and sustainability, and SLA protection. To address these gaps, a carbon-aware reinforcement-learning research framework is proposed that combines K-means-based task clustering, Q-learning, carbon-aware scheduling decisions, and SLA-aware task placement. The framework is designed to jointly consider latency, energy consumption, carbon impact, and quality-of-service requirements. A comparative evaluation methodology and research directions are also outlined to support future empirical validation of carbon-aware scheduling in heterogeneous edge environments.
KEYWORDS
This review examined recent research on reinforcement-learning-based and carbon-aware task scheduling in edge computing. The analysis identified key challenges related to carbon-intensity awareness, scalability, multi-objective optimization, and SLA protection. To address these gaps, the proposed CRTSE framework integrates K-means-based task clustering, Q-learning, carbon-aware scheduling, and SLA-aware task placement within a unified framework. The reward formulation jointly considers latency, energy consumption, carbon emissions, and SLA compliance. Since CRTSE is presented as a conceptual framework, its effectiveness requires validation through simulation and real-world experiments. Future research can investigate deep reinforcement learning, federated learning, predictive carbon-intensity models, and large-scale real-world validation to improve the practical applicability of carbon-aware edge computing.
[1] M. Cheong, H. Lee, I. Yeom, and H. Woo, "SCARL: Attentive Reinforcement Learning-Based Scheduling in a Multi-Resource Heterogeneous Cluster," IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 153432–153444, 2019. [2] X. Lu, C. Liu, S. Zhu, Y. Mao, P. Lio, and P. Hui, "RLPTO: A Reinforcement Learning-Based Performance-Time Optimized Task and Resource Scheduling Mechanism for Distributed Machine Learning," IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 34, no. 12, 2023. [3] Y. Wang, K. Deng, Y. Ren, J. Chan, G. Tian, and C. S. Jensen, "Reinforcement Learning for Tackling Energy-Saving and Energy-Balance Dilemma of Cluster-Based Routing Protocols in WSNs," IEEE Access, vol. 12, 2024. [4] A. Martin, I. de-la-Bandera, A. Mendo, J. Outes, J. Ramiro, and R. Barco, "Federated Deep Reinforcement Learning for ENDC Optimization," IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 24, no. 6, 2025. [5] H. Liu, L. Tian, and M. Guo, “CRTSE: Clustering and Reinforcement Learning Based Task Scheduling Algorithm for Edge Computing,” IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 129–145, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TCC.2025.3640958. [6] L. Wang et al., "Carbon-Aware Task Offloading for Sustainable Edge Computing," IEEE Internet Things J., 2024. [7] G. Gao et al., "Carbon-Aware Task Scheduling for Cloud-Edge IoT Systems," IEEE Internet Things J., 2026. [8] C. P. Leong, C. S. Liew, C. S. Chan, and M. H. U. Rehman, “Optimizing Workflow Task Clustering Using Reinforcement Learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 110614–110626, 2021. [9] A. Radovanović, R. Koningstein, I. Schneider, B. Chen, A. Duarte, B. Roy, D. Xiao, M. Haridasan, P. Hung, N. Care, and S. Talukdar, "Carbon-Aware Computing for Datacenters," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1270–1280, 2023. [10] A. Souza, S. Jasoria, B. Chakrabarty, A. Bridgwater, A. Lundberg, F. Skogh, A. Ali-Eldin, D. Irwin, and P. Shenoy, "Casper: Carbon-Aware Scheduling and Provisioning for Distributed Web Services," in Proc. 14th ACM Int. Green and Sustainable Computing Conf., 2023, pp. 67–73.
Publication Date
10/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
3
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...