Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66078
Volume:
10 |
7 |
Jul 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Economics
Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune
This paper examines women's well-being through the lens of Amartya Sen's Capability Approach and its alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 3, 4, and 13. Based on four qualitative, semi-structured interviews conducted with women from urban Pune and rural Baramati in Maharashtra, the study explores how resources, social norms, and contextual barriers shape women's real freedoms and life outcomes. The analysis uses the concepts of entitlement, conversion factors, capability sets, and functionings to assess the extent to which education, employment, mobility, health, and climate-related conditions enable or constrain women's agency. The findings indicate that access to formal education and employment does not automatically translate into well-being, as emotional stress, household responsibilities, infrastructure gaps, and limited institutional support continue to restrict women's capabilities. Rural participants, in particular, faced compounded constraints linked to gender norms, financial insecurity, and limited access to services, while urban participants experienced pressures associated with work-life balance and mental strain. The paper concludes that development strategies must move beyond output-oriented measures and instead prioritize women's lived experiences, emotional well-being, and freedom to choose valued lives.
KEYWORDS
This paper has examined women's well-being in Maharashtra through the Capability Approach and its alignment with SDGs 3, 4, and 13. Based on four qualitative interviews from urban Pune and rural Baramati, the study demonstrates that women's development cannot be understood through income, education, or employment alone. Emotional stress, domestic burden, limited mobility, uneven infrastructure, and social norms continue to constrain the conversion of resources into actual well-being. The interviews show both deprivation and resilience. Urban women may appear more advantaged in terms of education and employment, yet they continue to face time pressure, workplace stress, and emotional exhaustion. Rural women experience more severe structural constraints, but they also display strong agency, adaptability, and aspiration. The central conclusion is that development must be judged by what women are actually able to do and be. A capability-oriented approach offers a more humane and accurate framework for policy because it centers freedom, dignity, and lived experience. If development is to be truly sustainable and inclusive, it must address the visible and invisible barriers that shape women's everyday lives.
1. Frediani, A. A. (2010). Sen's Capability Approach as a Framework to the Practice of Development. Development in Practice, 20(2), 173–187. 2. Rauschmayer, F., & Lessmann, O. (2013). Institutions, Preferences, and Justice: Towards a More Comprehensive Sustainability Framework. Ecological Economics, 90, 162–170. 3. Seckler, M., & Volkert, J. (2021). Do Citizens Value Sustainability? Insights from Empirical Capability-Oriented Research. Forum for Social Economics, 50(4), 372–394. 4. Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A Need for Relevant Indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573. 5. United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/goals 6. WHO. (2021). Gender and Mental Health. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240039360 7. UNESCO. (2022). Global Education Monitoring Report: Gender Equality in Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org 8. Government of India. (2023). SDG India Index and Dashboard. NITI Aayog. https://sdgindiaindex.niti.gov.in/ 9. National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC). (2008). Government of India. https://moef.gov.in/en/division/environment-divisions/climate-change-cc/ 10. Primary interview data collected from: Pallavi Suryawanshi (Urban education administrator); Kanchan Jadhav (Rural tailor and SHG member); Benjira Sheikh (Rural daily wage worker); Samruddhi Ghadge (Urban tech professional).
Publication Date
7/15/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
27
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...