Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM62031

Central Bank Digital Currency vs. Crypto currency: A Comparative Study on Regulation, Stability, and Financial Inclusion”

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM62031

Volume:

10 |

4 |

April 2026

Pages:

1-16

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

TP

Tejaswi Pawar

MBA Finance management

MIT ADT University

Download Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

With various advancements in information technology and an increase in the reach that the internet has acquired, the issue of digital currency inevitably had to be addressed by this paper, which sheds light on the difference between CBDCs and crypto currencies. CBDCs are digital money created, kept, and maintained by central banks, while crypto currencies like Bit coin are decentralized and operate independently of government interference. The study investigates the following: the way they are regulated, their implications on financial stability, and how their operation could be beneficial for those who are unbanked. CBDCs are mainly safer and more stable, given their backing by governments, while crypto currencies would be riskier but would highlight person-to-person innovative ways of sending and receiving money.

KEYWORDS

Keywords: Cryptocurrency Bitcoin Digital money Financial stability Regulation Government-backed currency Digital economy Blockchain technology Innovation in payment systems.

Cite This Article

Tejaswi Pawar, "Central Bank Digital Currency vs. Crypto currency: A Comparative Study on Regulation, Stability, and Financial Inclusion”," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1-16, April 2026.

Full Article/Conclusion

The combined descriptive and correlation analyses together present a clear picture of the highly uneven and concentrated nature of the cryptocurrency market. A few major players, especially Bitcoin, dominate market capitalisation, unit price, and trading volume, which is responsible for skewing the overall averages. Wide ranges and high standard deviations across all variables confirm the volatility and disparities in the sector. The correlation analysis backs up these findings and provides evidence that market capitalisation is very much related to both unit price and trading volume. This implies that cryptocurrencies of higher value not only have a more significant portion of the market but also get the most trading activity.  On the other hand, circulating supply has a weak negative relationship with value and liquidity, which means that scarcity is more closely associated with higher prices and stronger market presence than abundance. The study, therefore, concludes that the cryptocurrency markets are primarily driven by the value concentration, investor preference for expensive coins, and liquidity in the dominant coins, rather than by the total number of tokens in circulation. This brings out the speculative and unequal nature of the market, as a small group of assets sets the trends for the whole market, and investors as well as policymakers have to face both opportunities and risks.

References

·        Podder, Bhaskar, has provided a fascinating regulatory perspective on the topic of “Cryptocurrency and Central Bank Digital Currency.” This article was published in the International Journal of Financial Studies, Economics and Management, Volume 2, Issue 3, in the Year 2023, covering the pages from 25 to 35. ResearchGate ·         ScienceDirect has published a paper titled “Central bank digital currency and cryptocurrency in emerging markets,” which will be available in 2024. ScienceDirect ·        The year 2023 saw the International Review of Financial Analysis tackle the topic of central bank digital currencies with an article entitled "A Critical Review," which is accessible on ScienceDirect ·         The question of whether central bank digital currency can lead to greater financial inclusion is currently being debated. ScienceDirect ·          Peterson K. Ozili has examined the interrelationship of CBDC, Fintech, and cryptocurrency in the context of financial inclusion and financial stability. • Banks in different parts of the world show a similarity in that the central bank digital currencies have a positive effect on financial stability. The evidence comes from the global banking sector. ·         The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has published a Working Paper in 2024 titled “Central Bank Digital Currencies and Financial Stability: Balance Sheet Analysis and Policy Choices.” — This paper provides a detailed balance-sheet analysis of CBDC issuance and the implications thereof for banking-sector stability and macroprudential responses. IMF ·         The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) conducted a survey on central bank digital currencies and published the results in 2021. Among others, the survey reveals banking CBDC activity and discusses potential risks to banks' funding, lending, and resilience. It can be particularly useful for cross-country design comparisons and stability analysis. Bank for International Settlements+1 ·         • The Financial Stability Board (2024) has come out with the G20 Crypto-Asset Policy Implementation Roadmap (FSB report). — This report discusses the global regulatory priorities for crypto-assets and outlines the policy steps required to alleviate the concerns regarding financial stability and consumer protection. It is beneficial in the context of the “regulation” aspect of the crypto vs CBDC debate. Financial Stability BoardWorld Bank. ·         Tan, B. J. (2024). Central bank digital currency and financial inclusion (Journal article). — Theoretical/modeling study on CBDC designs' influence on inclusion outcomes and possible trade-offs with bank intermediation. Helpful for empirical modeling or theory sections. ScienceDirect

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

4/30/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

3

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...