Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM61196
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Handling encrypted digital evidence creates two recurring bottlenecks: accessing password-protected files and, once accessed, documenting and controlling every subsequent action. Many available tools focus mainly on decryption and then leave investigators to record steps manually, which can introduce gaps in traceability. To address this, we developed Cipher Break, a system that combines password recovery with end-to-end evidence activity trackingâfrom initial upload through report generation. Implemented using Python (Flask) and PostgreSQL, Cipher Break supports both dictionary and brute-force attacks and executes jobs across multiple threads to improve throughput while preserving correctness. Each decryption attempt, verification event, and access action is automatically logged to maintain a continuous chain of custody. Security is strengthened through role-based access control, SMS-based login verification, and SHA-256 integrity checks to detect unauthorized modification. Feedback from forensic practitioners and law-enforcement users informed interface refinements, clearer audit trails, and more granular visibility controls. Overall, Cipher Break provides a practical Digital Evidence Decryption and Management System that is fast when required, strict where it matters, and simple to operate in day-to-day investigative work.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/24/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...