Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM16846
Volume:
6 |
12 |
Dec 2022
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Decision support systems (DSS) are computer programs supported AI styles that contribute to reaching an accurate decision in an frequently-narrow sphere of interest. Clinical decision support systems( CDSS) are similar DSSs which may be used by medical professionals in conventions and hospitals. They ’re used for opinion, treatment protocol recommendations, treatment outgrowth prognostications and other tasks. CDSS are constructed supported emblematic and machine literacy ( including deep literacy) approaches to represent and infer medical knowledge. The end of this work is to supply an overview of history and current styles in designing a successful CDSS. The study considers the systems that were claimed to be enforced in clinical practice. presently, the event of a CDSS is generally pursued in two directions 1) a more traditional approach grounded on rules, ontologies, probabilistic models, and therefore the application of norms; 2) machine literacy grounded approach. Both approaches could indeed be used reciprocal within a healthcare data system. This work seeks to supply an objective view on the advantages and limitations of the approaches as well to bandy unborn exploration avenues that could lead to more accurate and secure CDSS and bettered healthcare
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/11/2022
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...