Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM27803
Volume:
7 |
12 |
Dec 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Code generation has become a potent asset in software development, streamlining repetitive tasks and empowering developers to focus on higher-level priorities. Despite the remarkable progress of existing models, their training datasets often lack real-world context and a diverse array of code examples. This paper introduces an innovative code generation approach by harnessing Stack Overflow answers and GitHub Gists. Stack Overflow furnishes comprehensive contextual information around code snippets, while Gists offer a curated compilation of tailored solutions to specific problems. We hypothesize that merging these datasets will result in models generating code that is more akin to human-like, task-oriented, and efficient solutions. Our experiments affirm that this proposed approach surpasses baseline models trained on conventional code repositories, showcasing substantial advancements across several critical metrics. Additionally, we delve into an analysis of the generated code, emphasizing its heightened readability, maintainability, and applicability to specific tasks. Finally, we discuss the limitations encountered and chart potential future trajectories for this research, aiming to pave the way for even more robust and practical code generation models.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/30/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...