Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM64222

CodeSage Docs: An AI-Driven Platform for Repository Intelligence, Code Review, and Documentation Automation

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM64222

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1-6

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM64222

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Ayush K

Ayush K

Computer Science

Malnad College of Engineering

Download Author Certificate
Ganavi K V

Ganavi K V

Computer Science

Malnad College of Engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate
Gagan Ravi Karjagi

Gagan Ravi Karjagi

Computer Science

Malnad College of Engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate
Brinda M S

Brinda M S

Computer Science

Malnad College of Engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

Nithyashree R

Nithyashree R

Computer Science

Malnad College of Engineering

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Most engineering teams today live inside platforms like GitHub or GitLab, where dozens of contributors push code from different time zones, often without much coordination. In any project of reasonable size, the repository never really sits still — commits accumulate, branches get created and collapsed, and Pull Requests arrive faster than anyone can comfortably read them. Staying on top of documentation and code review under those conditions is harder than it looks. Developers are not negligent; they’re simply busy shipping things. When something has to slip, it’s almost always the documentation that goes first — and review thoroughness follows not far behind. This paper presents CodeSage Docs, a system we built to take that burden off developers. It hooks into the standard Git workflow and uses Large Language Models to automatically interpret what changed, write commit summaries that actually make sense, keep documentation in step with the codebase, and give Pull Requests a first-pass review before a human reviewer even opens the diff. The plumbing underneath connects GitHub Webhooks to an Express.js server, runs inference through OpenAI’s API, and stores everything in MongoDB. The practical effect is less manual overhead, fewer things slipping through code review, and documentation that does not immediately become a lie the moment someone refactors a module.

KEYWORDS

Large Language Models Code Review Automa- tion Documentation Generation GitHub Webhooks DevOps Repository Intelligence

Cite This Article

Ayush K, Ganavi K V, Gagan Ravi Karjagi, Brinda M S, Nithyashree R, "CodeSage Docs: An AI-Driven Platform for Repository Intelligence, Code Review, and Documentation Automation," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-6, May 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM64222

Full Article/Conclusion

Modern codebases move fast and have too many moving parts for manual documentation and review to keep up re- liably. That is not a failing of any particular team; it is just what happens when development velocity outpaces the tooling designed to support it. CodeSage Docs is our attempt to close that gap. Connecting GitHub’s event stream to an LLM-powered processing pipeline through an Express.js backend, with MongoDB holding the results, gives teams a system that genuinely tracks what is happening in their repository and does something useful with that information automatically. In practice, the automated commit summaries made code- bases easier to navigate. Documentation stopped being a manual chore. PR reviews caught things earlier. None of this is magic — the model makes mistakes, and a human reviewer is still essential for anything consequential. But having a reliable first pass, and having documentation that does not immediately drift from reality, noticeably reduces the friction of working in a large codebase. There is still plenty to build. Multi-repository support, natural language search, deeper security analysis, and a con- versational interface are all on the roadmap. The modular architecture was designed with that in mind, so adding them will not require rethinking the foundation. The broader point CodeSage Docs demonstrates is that AI is most effective when it is woven into the workflow rather than sitting next to it. When understanding a codebase is a continuous automated process rather than a periodic manual effort, teams can spend less time explaining what they built and more time building it.

References

[1]     Y. Li et al., “Code Reviewer: Pre-Training for Automating Code Review Activities,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2023. [2]     S. Liu et al., “Auto Commit: Diff-Aware Transformer for Commit Message Generation,” Journal of Automated Software Engineering, 2024. [3]     A. Gupta and M. Chen, “RAG-Based Software Repository Comprehen- sion,” ICSE Proceedings, 2025. [4]     K. Patel, “Continuous Documentation Systems in Agile Development,” Software Engineering Journal, 2024. [5]     B. Wang and H. Lee, “Semantic Code Diffing for AI-Based Code Review,” ACM SIGSOFT, 2025. [6]     J. Doe et al., “Dev Agents: Autonomous DevOps Systems,” AI for Software Engineering Workshop, 2025. [7]     R. Verma, “Vulnerability Detection in CI/CD Pipelines Using LLMs,” DevSecOps Journal, 2024. [8]     H. Tan et al., “Deep Learning for Commit Message Generation,” IEEE Access, 2023. [9]     OpenAI Research, “Large Language Models for Code Understanding,” 2023. [10]    M. Smith et al., “GitHub Webhook-Based Event Processing Systems,” Cloud Computing Conference, 2022. [11]    Y. Zhang et al., “AI-Assisted Software Engineering Survey,” IEEE Computing Surveys, 2025.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/28/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

3

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...