Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM66416

COGNITIVE HEALING ARCHITECTURE: INTEGRATING AI AND HUMAN-CENTERED DESIGN IN HEALTHCARE ENVIRONMENTS

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM66416

Volume:

10 |

7 |

Jul 2026

Pages:

1-13

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM66416

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

AST

Ar. Sumiran Takhtani

Department of Architecture

IPS Acedemy, Indore

Download Author Certificate
ASP

Ar. Sachin Paliwal

Department of Architecture

IPS Acedemy, Indore

Download Co-Author Certificate
ANK

Ar. Neelam Kushwah

Department of Architecture

IPS Acedemy, Indore

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Healthcare architecture has evolved beyond functional planning to support patient recovery, emotional well-being, and overall user experience. At the same time, advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI), smart technologies, and responsive building systems are transforming healthcare environments. However, limited research integrates healing architecture with AI through a human-centered architectural approach. This study investigates the role of AI in creating adaptive, efficient, and emotionally supportive healthcare environments through a review of literature, analysis of emerging technologies, and comparative case studies of Khoo Teck Puat Hospital (Singapore) and Humber River Hospital (Canada). Based on these findings, the study proposes the A.I.H.E.A.L. Framework (Artificial Intelligence for Human-Centered Environment, Adaptation and Learning), which combines environmental sensing, behavioural analytics, predictive intelligence, adaptive building systems, and continuous learning to develop responsive healing environments. The framework positions AI as a tool that enhances empathy, personalization, and environmental adaptability rather than replacing human-centered design. It concludes that future hospitals should function as intelligent healing ecosystems capable of understanding, anticipating, and responding to user needs in real time, thereby improving patient outcomes, operational efficiency, and the role of architecture in healthcare delivery.

KEYWORDS

Artificial Intelligence Healing Architecture Human-Centered Design Smart Hospitals Adaptive Architecture Healthcare Design Evidence-Based Design Responsive Environments.

Cite This Article

Ar. Sumiran Takhtani, Ar. Sachin Paliwal, Ar. Neelam Kushwah, "COGNITIVE HEALING ARCHITECTURE: INTEGRATING AI AND HUMAN-CENTERED DESIGN IN HEALTHCARE ENVIRONMENTS," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1-13, Jul 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM66416

Full Article/Conclusion

This study explored the integration of Artificial Intelligence with healing architecture to address the growing need for adaptive, patient-centered healthcare environments. The review of literature and comparative analysis revealed that existing approaches often emphasize either therapeutic design or technological efficiency, with limited integration of both. To bridge this gap, the study proposed the A.I.H.E.A.L. Framework as a conceptual model for intelligent healthcare architecture. The framework introduces the concept of Cognitive Healing Architecture, where healthcare environments continuously sense, interpret, adapt, and learn from user needs to support physical, emotional, and psychological well-being. Unlike conventional smart hospital models that primarily focus on operational performance, the proposed approach places empathy, personalization, and environmental responsiveness at the core of architectural design. This research demonstrates how Artificial Intelligence can extend the principles of healing architecture beyond static design, enabling hospitals to evolve into intelligent healing ecosystems. As AI technologies continue to advance, integrating technological intelligence with compassionate design will be essential in shaping the next generation of healthcare architecture.

References

1.       Andrade, C. C., Devlin, A. S., Pereira, C. R., & Lima, M. L. (2017). Do the hospital rooms make a difference for patients' stress? A multilevel analysis of the role of perceived control, positive distraction, and social support. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 63–72. 2.       Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2018). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. 3.       HDR Architecture. (2015). Humber River Hospital. 4.       Humber River Hospital. (2024). About Humber River Health. 5.       International Organization for Standardization. (2019). ISO 9241-210:2019 Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Human-centred design for interactive systems. ISO. 6.       International WELL Building Institute. (2023). WELL Building Standard (v2). IWBI. 7.       Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press. 8.       Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J. H., & Mador, M. L. (2008). Biophilic design: The theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. John Wiley & Sons. 9.       Khoo Teck Puat Hospital. (2024). About Khoo Teck Puat Hospital. 10.    Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things (Revised and expanded ed.). Basic Books.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

7/30/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

2

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

25

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...