Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68641
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Computer Science and Engineering
Adhiyamaan College Of Engineering

Computer Science and Engineering
Adhiyamaan College Of Engineering

Computer Science and Engineering
Adhiyamaan College Of Engineering

Computer Science and Engineering
Adhiyamaan College Of Engineering
Students need textbooks, calculators, laboratory equipment and project components for short periods, yet buying every item new is costly while many useful items lie unused once a semester ends. Informal exchange through friends, social-media groups and notice boards is slow, unstructured and untraceable. This paper presents CampusShare, a web-based College Resource Sharing Platform that lets students list, search, buy, rent and borrow academic resources within a college community. The application uses HTML, CSS, JavaScript and Bootstrap on the front end, Python Flask on the back end and SQLite for storage. Its modules cover registration and authentication with hashed passwords, resource listing with multiple images or videos, keyword and category search, buy and rental request management with owner approval, and handover verification through a unique transaction ID and QR code. A working implementation is demonstrated through its user-interface screens. The platform reduces the cost of academic materials, promotes reuse, and replaces scattered messaging with a single, organised and traceable process.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented CampusShare, a Flask and SQLite web application that lets students buy, rent and borrow academic resources within a college. The implementation provides secure registration, multi-media resource listing, keyword and category search, owner-approved requests and QR-based handover verification. It replaces scattered informal exchange with one organised process and encourages reuse of materials that would otherwise sit idle. Planned work includes ratings and reviews, trust scores, damage reporting, a full transaction history, e-mail and in-app notifications for requests and return dates, QR confirmation of returns, and a usability study with students to measure adoption and savings.
[1] K. Frenken and J. Schor, “Putting the sharing economy into perspective,” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 23, pp. 3–10, 2017. [2] R. Belk, “You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 1595–1600, 2014. [3] J. Hamari, M. Sjöklint, and A. Ukkonen, “The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 2047–2059, 2016. [4] A. Geissinger, C. Laurell, C. Öberg, and C. Sandström, “How sustainable is the sharing economy? On the sustainability connotations of sharing economy platforms,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 206, pp. 419–429, 2019. [5] J. Wirtz, K. K. F. So, M. A. Mody, S. Q. Liu, and H. H. Chun, “Platforms in the peer-to-peer sharing economy,” Journal of Service Management, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 452–483, 2019. [6] S. Benjaafar, G. Kong, X. Li, and C. Courcoubetis, “Peer-to-peer product sharing: Implications for ownership, usage, and social welfare in the sharing economy,” Management Science, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 477–493, 2019. [7] S. Dhanorkar, “Environmental benefits of internet-enabled C2C closed-loop supply chains: A quasi-experimental study of Craigslist,” Management Science, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 660–680, 2019. [8] J. Zeng, M. M. Tavalaei, and Z. Khan, “Sharing economy platform firms and their resource orchestration approaches,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 136, pp. 451–465, 2021. [9] E. Ert, A. Fleischer, and N. Magen, “Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb,” Tourism Management, vol. 55, pp. 62–73, 2016. [10] M. Möhlmann, “Collaborative consumption: Determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 193–207, 2015.
Publication Date
10/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...