Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68535
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Zeal Polytechnic
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Zeal Polytechnic
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Zeal Polytechnic
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Zeal Polytechnic
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Zeal Polytechnic
Large language model (LLM) inference can exceed the memory and compute capacity of a single consumer device. Distributed inference pools resources across machines, but performance depends on communication latency, bandwidth, hardware heterogeneity, availability, and reconfiguration cost. This survey reviews collaborative inference, heterogeneous scheduling, prefill–decode disaggregation, and memory offloading. Petals, HexGen, HexGen-2, MoLink, DistServe, Splitwise, and FlexGen are compared qualitatively because their workloads and evaluation settings differ. We then outline a conceptual adaptive execution-plan selector that profiles devices and links, filters infeasible layer partitions, estimates execution cost, and accounts for interruption risk and replanning overhead. The framework is a research proposal, not a validated system.
KEYWORDS
Distributed LLM inference can pool memory and compute across devices, but introduces communication, scheduling, and reliability costs. Existing systems explore collaborative hosting, heterogeneous parallelism, phase disaggregation, communication scheduling, and memory offloading; their results cannot be ranked directly across different evaluations. This survey proposes a lightweight layer-wise execution-plan selector based on compute time, communication cost, availability, and reconfiguration overhead. Implementation and controlled experiments are required to validate its cost model and determine when adaptation improves performance.
[1] A. Borzunov, D. Baranchuk, T. Dettmers, M. Ryabinin, Y. Belkada, A. Chumachenko, P. Samygin, and C. Raffel, ‒Petals: Collaborative Inference and Fine-tuning of Large Models,‒ in Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Volume 3: System Demonstrations, pp. 558–568, 2023. doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.acl-demo.54. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2023.acl-demo.54/ [2] A. Borzunov, M. Ryabinin, A. Chumachenko, D. Baranchuk, T. Dettmers, Y. Belkada, P. Samygin, and C. Raffel, “Distributed Inference and Fine-tuning of Large Language Models Over The Internet,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36, 2023. doi: 10.52202/075280-0540. Available: https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/hash/28bf1419b9a1f908c15f6195f58cb865-Abstract-Conference.html [3] Y. Jiang, R. Yan, X. Yao, Y. Zhou, B. Chen, and B. Yuan, ‒HexGen: Generative Inference of Large Language Model over Heterogeneous Environment,‒ in Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR 235, pp. 21946–21961, 2024. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/jiang24f.html [4] Y. Jiang, R. Yan, and B. Yuan, ‒HexGen-2: Disaggregated Generative Inference of LLMs in Heterogeneous Environment,‒ in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025. Available: https://proceedings.iclr.cc/paper_files/paper/2025/hash/0b941a1e5fbce23fe46b049999d04ed0-Abstract-Conference.html [5] A. Habibi and E. Erçetin, ‒Edge-LLM Inference With Cost-Aware Layer Allocation and Adaptive Scheduling,‒ IEEE Access, 2025. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3592308. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3592308 [6] L. Jin, K. Zhang, Y. Chen, Y. Zhuo, R. Li, Y. Gao, B. Yang, Z. Cai, and W. Dong, ‒Distributed LLM Serving on Consumer-Grade GPUs by Reconciling Computation and Communication,‒ in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, pp. 17633–17642, 2025. doi: 10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.957. Available: https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-emnlp.957/ [7] Y. Zhong et al., ‒DistServe: Disaggregating Prefill and Decoding for Goodput-optimized Large Language Model Serving,‒ in 18th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), 2024. Available: https://www.usenix.org/conference/osdi24/presentation/zhong-yinmin [8] A. Patel et al., ‒Splitwise: Efficient Generative LLM Inference Using Phase Splitting,‒ in Proceedings of the 51st Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA), 2024. doi: 10.1109/ISCA59077.2024.00019. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCA59077.2024.00019 [9] W. Sheng et al., ‒FlexGen: High-Throughput Generative Inference of Large Language Models with a Single GPU,‒ in Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR 202, 2023. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v202/sheng23a.html
Publication Date
10/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
3
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...