Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM55155
Volume:
9 |
12 |
Dec 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The efficiency of solar photovoltaic (PV) systems heavily relies on the optimal operation of the Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithm, which ensures that the system operates at its maximum power output despite varying environmental conditions. This paper presents a comparative analysis of two MPPT control methods: the Incremental Conductance (IncCond) method and Random Forest (RF) regression, implemented in MATLAB Simulink. The IncCond method, known for its precise tracking performance under varying irradiance and temperature conditions, is compared with the machine learning-based Random Forest method, which leverages historical data for adaptive learning and decision-making. Both models are simulated under real-world conditions, and their performance is evaluated using key metrics such as tracking efficiency, convergence time, and power output accuracy. The results indicate that while the IncCond method demonstrates reliable performance and faster convergence, the Random Forest-based method offers enhanced adaptability and robustness to fluctuating environmental conditions. This study highlights the potential of machine learning techniques in improving the performance of MPPT algorithms, with Random Forest emerging as a promising alternative to traditional methods.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/16/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...