Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM55155

Comparative Analysis of Incremental Conductance and Random Forest Methods for Maximum Power Point Tracking in Solar PV Systems

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM55155

Volume:

9 |

12 |

Dec 2025

Pages:

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

C

ChanchalArya1

MPP

Mr. Pawan Pandey2

Author Services & Downloads

Full Articles

Abstract

The efficiency of solar photovoltaic (PV) systems heavily relies on the optimal operation of the Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithm, which ensures that the system operates at its maximum power output despite varying environmental conditions. This paper presents a comparative analysis of two MPPT control methods: the Incremental Conductance (IncCond) method and Random Forest (RF) regression, implemented in MATLAB Simulink. The IncCond method, known for its precise tracking performance under varying irradiance and temperature conditions, is compared with the machine learning-based Random Forest method, which leverages historical data for adaptive learning and decision-making. Both models are simulated under real-world conditions, and their performance is evaluated using key metrics such as tracking efficiency, convergence time, and power output accuracy. The results indicate that while the IncCond method demonstrates reliable performance and faster convergence, the Random Forest-based method offers enhanced adaptability and robustness to fluctuating environmental conditions. This study highlights the potential of machine learning techniques in improving the performance of MPPT algorithms, with Random Forest emerging as a promising alternative to traditional methods.

KEYWORDS

Cite This Article

ChanchalArya1, Mr. Pawan Pandey2, "Comparative Analysis of Incremental Conductance and Random Forest Methods for Maximum Power Point Tracking in Solar PV Systems," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 9, no. 12, Dec 2025.

Full Article/Conclusion

References

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

12/16/2025

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...