Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM51152
Volume:
9 |
7 |
Jul 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
By enabling networked devices to collect, process, and exchange data in real time, the Internet of Things (IoT) is revolutionizing industries. However, this growth raises complex legal challenges, especially regarding intellectual property rights (IPR). IoT systems integrate hardware, software, connectivity, and data, complicating intellectual property protection and enforcement across jurisdictions. This research presents a comparative study of IPR regimes governing IoT in six major regions: the US, EU, India, China, Japan, and Brazil. It examines laws related to patents, copyrights, trade secrets, and data protection, assessing their impact on IoT innovation, privacy, and enforcement. The study identifies significant similarities and differences among these regions regarding policy clarity, enforcement strength, and adaptability to emerging technologies. It also highlights the challenges innovators face due to cross-border legal discrepancies and proposes legislative recommendations to harmonize IPR practices in the IoT landscape. This comparative analysis aims to support lawmakers, legal professionals, and technology innovators in developing an equitable legal environment that protects intellectual property while fostering IoT growth.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
1/6/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...