Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM57618
Volume:
10 |
3 |
Mar 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This research presents a comparative analysis of Reinforced Concrete (RCC) framed structures and RCC diagrid structures for high-rise buildings ranging from G+10 to G+50 storeys. Using ETABS software, the study evaluates structural performance under gravity, wind, and seismic loads in seismic zone V. Key parameters assessed include base reaction, storey displacement, storey drift, storey shear, stiffness, lateral loading, and overturning moment. Results indicate that diagrid structures exhibit superior lateral stiffness, reduced displacement (up to 45% lower), and better resistance to seismic forces compared to traditional framed structures. However, the efficiency of diagrids diminishes with increasing height, suggesting optimal use for mid-rise buildings. The findings highlight the potential of diagrid systems for enhanced structural efficiency and sustainability in high-rise construction.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
3/13/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...