Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:10.55041/IJSREM57618

Comparative Analysis of RCC Framed and Diagrid Structures for High-Rise Buildings for Varying Height From G+10 To G+50 Storeys

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

10.55041/IJSREM57618

Volume:

10 |

3 |

Mar 2026

Pages:

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM57618

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

SS

Shilpi Singhai1

SD

Siddhartha Deb2

AR

Anubhav Rai3

Author Services & Downloads

Full Articles

Abstract

This research presents a comparative analysis of Reinforced Concrete (RCC) framed structures and RCC diagrid structures for high-rise buildings ranging from G+10 to G+50 storeys. Using ETABS software, the study evaluates structural performance under gravity, wind, and seismic loads in seismic zone V. Key parameters assessed include base reaction, storey displacement, storey drift, storey shear, stiffness, lateral loading, and overturning moment. Results indicate that diagrid structures exhibit superior lateral stiffness, reduced displacement (up to 45% lower), and better resistance to seismic forces compared to traditional framed structures. However, the efficiency of diagrids diminishes with increasing height, suggesting optimal use for mid-rise buildings. The findings highlight the potential of diagrid systems for enhanced structural efficiency and sustainability in high-rise construction.

KEYWORDS

Diagrid structure RCC framed structure high-rise buildings ETABS analysis seismic performance wind loads storey displacement storey drift stiffness overturning moment

Cite This Article

Shilpi Singhai1, Siddhartha Deb2, Anubhav Rai3, "Comparative Analysis of RCC Framed and Diagrid Structures for High-Rise Buildings for Varying Height From G+10 To G+50 Storeys," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 3, Mar 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM57618

Full Article/Conclusion

References

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

3/13/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

3

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...