Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM63011

Comparative Analysis of YOLO11, Vision Transformer (ViT), EfficientNet-V2, and Swin Transformer

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM63011

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1-3

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Surya Ashok

Surya Ashok

Department of Computer Science

College of Applied Science Chelakkara

Download Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Computer vision has emerged as a major research area in artificial intelligence because of its ability to automate visual understanding tasks. Recent deep learning models have improved the performance of image classification, object detection, and recognition systems. This paper presents a comparative study of four modern computer vision architectures: YOLO11, Vision Transformer (ViT), EfficientNet-V2, and Swin Transformer. The comparison focuses on architecture structure, processing speed, computational requirements, scalability, and practical applications. A Python OpenCV implementation is also included to demonstrate a real-time comparison system. The study highlights the advantages and limitations of each model and identifies their suitability for different computer vision applications.

KEYWORDS

Key Words: Computer Vision YOLO11 Vision Transformer EfficientNet-V2 OpenCV

Cite This Article

Surya Ashok, "Comparative Analysis of YOLO11, Vision Transformer (ViT), EfficientNet-V2, and Swin Transformer," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-3, May 2026.

Full Article/Conclusion

This paper compared four modern computer vision architectures: YOLO11, Vision Transformer (ViT), EfficientNet-V2, and Swin Transformer. The study showed that YOLO11 performs efficiently in real-time object detection, while EfficientNet-V2 provides lightweight and computationally efficient image classification. ViT and Swin Transformer demonstrated strong contextual understanding and scalability through attention mechanisms. The comparison highlights that CNN-based models are suitable for real-time and lightweight applications, whereas Transformer-based architectures are more effective for large-scale visual understanding tasks. Future computer vision systems are expected to combine the advantages of both CNN and Transformer architectures for improved performance and efficiency.

References

1. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., Farhadi, A.: You Only Look Once: Unified Real-Time Object Detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Press, Las Vegas (2016) 779–788 2. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D.: An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. In: International Conference on Learning Representations. Springer, Vienna (2021) 1–21 3. Tan, M., Le, Q.: EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Training. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, Virtual Conference (2021) 10096–10106 4.  Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H.: Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE Press, Montreal (2021) 9992–10002 5. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Press, Las Vegas (2016) 770–778 6.  Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. 1 (2015) 1–14 7. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., Sun, J.: Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39 (2017) 1137–1149 8. Howard, A., Sandler, M., Chu, G., Chen, L.: Searching for MobileNetV3. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE Press, Seoul (2019) 1314–1324 9.  Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.: ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Commun. ACM 60 (2017) 84–90 Bochkovskiy, A., Wang, C., Liao, H.: YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2004.10934 (2020) 1–17

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/10/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

3

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...