Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63011
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-3
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Computer Science
College of Applied Science Chelakkara
Computer vision has emerged as a major research area in artificial intelligence because of its ability to automate visual understanding tasks. Recent deep learning models have improved the performance of image classification, object detection, and recognition systems. This paper presents a comparative study of four modern computer vision architectures: YOLO11, Vision Transformer (ViT), EfficientNet-V2, and Swin Transformer. The comparison focuses on architecture structure, processing speed, computational requirements, scalability, and practical applications. A Python OpenCV implementation is also included to demonstrate a real-time comparison system. The study highlights the advantages and limitations of each model and identifies their suitability for different computer vision applications.
KEYWORDS
This paper compared four modern computer vision architectures: YOLO11, Vision Transformer (ViT), EfficientNet-V2, and Swin Transformer. The study showed that YOLO11 performs efficiently in real-time object detection, while EfficientNet-V2 provides lightweight and computationally efficient image classification. ViT and Swin Transformer demonstrated strong contextual understanding and scalability through attention mechanisms. The comparison highlights that CNN-based models are suitable for real-time and lightweight applications, whereas Transformer-based architectures are more effective for large-scale visual understanding tasks. Future computer vision systems are expected to combine the advantages of both CNN and Transformer architectures for improved performance and efficiency.
1. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., Farhadi, A.: You Only Look Once: Unified Real-Time Object Detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Press, Las Vegas (2016) 779–788 2. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D.: An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. In: International Conference on Learning Representations. Springer, Vienna (2021) 1–21 3. Tan, M., Le, Q.: EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Training. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, Virtual Conference (2021) 10096–10106 4. Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H.: Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE Press, Montreal (2021) 9992–10002 5. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Press, Las Vegas (2016) 770–778 6. Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. 1 (2015) 1–14 7. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., Sun, J.: Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39 (2017) 1137–1149 8. Howard, A., Sandler, M., Chu, G., Chen, L.: Searching for MobileNetV3. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE Press, Seoul (2019) 1314–1324 9. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.: ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Commun. ACM 60 (2017) 84–90 Bochkovskiy, A., Wang, C., Liao, H.: YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2004.10934 (2020) 1–17
Publication Date
5/10/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...