Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM51897
Volume:
9 |
8 |
Aug 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The urgent need for sustainable alternatives to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) has driven the exploration of geopolymer concrete (GPC) as a viable solution to reduce carbon emissions and utilize industrial by-products. This study presents a comparative evaluation of geopolymer concrete synthesized using two primary binders: Class F fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS). The research investigates the influence of these materials on fresh properties, mechanical performance (compressive, split tensile, and flexural strengths), and durability under acidic and sulphate environments. Fly ash-based GPC required elevated curing temperatures for optimal strength gain, while GGBS-based GPC demonstrated rapid early-age strength under ambient conditions due to its higher calcium content. Experimental results revealed that GGBS-GPC exhibited superior early compressive and flexural strengths, whereas fly ash-GPC showed enhanced durability under aggressive chemical exposure. The findings highlight the potential of GPC, particularly hybrid blends, to replace OPC in structural applications, contributing to reduced environmental impact and enhanced construction sustainability. The study also emphasizes the necessity for further standardization of mix design and curing protocols to facilitate the practical adoption of geopolymer technologies in mainstream construction.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
8/21/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...