Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM66731

Comparative Evaluation of Structural Behaviour and Design Efficiency of Pre-Engineered Buildings and Conventional Steel Sheds

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM66731

Volume:

10 |

8 |

Aug 2026

Pages:

1-8

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

KIMA

Khan Ikrama Mujtaba Ali

Civil Engineering Department

P.E.S College of Engineering, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, M.S.

Download Author Certificate
DDNK

Dr. D. N. Kakade

Civil Engineering Department

P.E.S College of Engineering, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, M.S.

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Pre-engineered buildings are mostly prepared using predesigning and prefabrication process. The advancement in the pre-engineered building construction approach involves time limitation, cost-effectiveness, improved structural behaviour and advanced architectural view. Pre-engineered buildings are becoming an effective replacement of conventional steel buildings in every aspect. It shows more advanced results in case of cost comparison, construction time, quality parameters and architectural point of view. The main objective of the current study is to compare pre-engineered steel buildings and conventional steel building in every aspect. A pre-engineered building was designed and then comparative analysis was done concerning a conventional building with the same configuration. The software which was mainly used for the entire designing and analysis part was Bentley STAAD PRO and it was found that the Pre-engineered building gives more sustainable results as compared to conventional steel buildings. It was also found that, if the construction process was according to conventional methods it will be more time consuming and more budget consuming at every aspect, so pre-engineered buildings usage should be implemented as the construction as well as the maintenance cost of pre-engineered buildings is very less as that of conventional steel buildings...In this project work we have compare parametric evaluation of pre –engineered building (PEB) and conventional industrial sheds of length 120m and width 60m under the influence of moving crane loads for both pinned support and fixed support using STAAD Pro.

KEYWORDS

Max. Displacement Time period Base shear STAAD Pro.etc.

Cite This Article

Khan Ikrama Mujtaba Ali, Dr. D. N. Kakade, "Comparative Evaluation of Structural Behaviour and Design Efficiency of Pre-Engineered Buildings and Conventional Steel Sheds," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1-8, Aug 2026.

Full Article/Conclusion

1.      While analyzing Pre-Engineered Building(PEB) and conventional steel sheds of same size it was observed that deflection values are less in Pre Engineered Building as compared to conventional steel sheds. 2.      From table number two and graph number one it was observed that deflection values in Pinned based PEB are greater than Pinned based conventional steel sheds. 3.      Also from table number three and graph number two it was observed that deflection values in fixed based PEB are less as compared to fixed based conventional steel shades. 4.      From table number four and graph number three it was observed that time period for PEB in pinned based is less as compared to Pinned based conventional steel sheds. 5.      From table number five and graph number four it was observed that time period for PEB in Fixed based is less as compared to fixed based conventional steel sheds . 6.      While analyzing it was observed that base shear values for both pinned base and fixed based in PEB are less as compared to conventional steel sheds as shown in table number six and seven and graph numbers five and six .

References

[1]     Firoz, S., Kumar, S. C. & Rao, S. K. 2012. “Design Concept of Pre Engineered Building”. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) 2 (2) (2012): 267-272. [2]     Thorat, A. R. & Patil, S. K. “A Study of Performance of Pre-Engineered Building of an Industrial Warehouse for Dynamic Load”. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) 4 (6) (2017): 2240- 2246. [3]     Lande, P. S. & Kucheriya, V. V. “Comparative Study of an Industrial Pre-Engineered Building with Conventional Steel Building”. Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Technology 2 (10) (2015): 77-82. [4]     Dubey, A. & Sahare, A. “Main Frame Design of Pre-Engineered Building”. International Journal of Innovations in Engineering Research and Technology (IJIERT) 3 (11) (2016): 12-18. [5]     Meera, C. M. “Pre-Engineered Building Design of an Industrial Warehouse”. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Emerging Technologies (IJESET) 5 (2) (2013): 75 – 82. [6]     Patil, S. S. “Analysis and Design of Pre Engineered Building of an Industrial Warehouse”. International Journal of Current Engineering and Scientific Research (IJCESR) 4 (12) (2017): 39- 43. [7]     Katkar, D. D. & Phadtare, N. P. “Comparative Study of an Industrial Pre-Engineered Building with Conventional Steel Building”. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) 5 (10) (2018): 127- 133. doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00024-8. [8]     Kiran, G. S., Rao, A. K. & Kumar, R. P. “Comparison of Design Procedures for Pre Engineered Buildings (PEB): A Case Study”. International Journal of Civil, Architectural, And Structural and Construction Engineering 8 (4) (2014): 480-484. [9]     Kolate, N. & Kewate, S. 2015. “Economizing Steel Building Using Pre Engineered Steel Sections”. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 6 (12) (2015): 69-74. [10]   Stania I Patra, Melitia D’Mello. “Analysis of Pre-Engineered building and Conventional building using Primavera software”. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering & Management (IJAREM) 3(7) (2017): 97-101.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

8/17/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...