Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63352
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-8
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of electronics and communication engineering
SJC Institute of technology

Department of electronics and communication engineering
SJC Institute of technology
Road traffic fatalities remain a critical global public health crisis, with two-wheeled vehicle accidents responsible for a disproportionately large share of preventable deaths in developing nations, where helmet compliance enforcement is severely constrained by inadequate surveillance infrastructure. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative evaluation of YOLOv8m and YOLOv12m applied to motorcycle helmet compliance detection and Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) under realistic Indian urban traffic conditions captured via mobile dashcam imagery. A 1,000-image dataset curated from the publicly available Indian Helmet Detection Dataset on Kaggle (aryanvaid13, 942 images) was augmented via horizontal flipping, brightness jitter (±25%), Gaussian noise injection, and mosaic augmentation, and partitioned into 600 training, 100 validation, and 200 test images annotated through Roboflow. Both architectures were fine-tuned via transfer learning from COCO-pretrained weights on Google Colaboratory with an NVIDIA Tesla T4 GPU. YOLOv12m—capitalising on its novel Residual Efficient Layer Aggregation Network (R-ELAN) backbone and Area Attention Mechanism—achieves mAP@50 of 91.20% and F1-score of 91.08%, surpassing the 90% threshold across all three detection classes (Helmet: 92.50%, No-Helmet: 90.10%, Number-Plate: 91.00%), and substantially outperforming YOLOv8m (mAP@50: 58.70%, F1: 65.50%). The mAP@50-95 improvement from 24.20% to 47.60% confirms superior localisation precision critical for downstream OCR accuracy. These findings establish YOLOv12m as the preferred architecture for vision-based traffic enforcement systems.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented a rigorous comparative evaluation of YOLOv8m and YOLOv12m for motorcycle helmet compliance detection and Automatic Number Plate Recognition in Indian urban dashcam imagery. The study employed a reproducible 1,000-image dataset sourced from the publicly available Indian Helmet Detection Dataset on Kaggle [8], partitioned into 600 training, 100 validation, and 200 test images, annotated via Roboflow [11], and evaluated on Google Colaboratory T4 GPU infrastructure. YOLOv12m demonstrated statistically significant and operationally meaningful improvements across all evaluation metrics: mAP@50 of 91.20% vs. 58.70% for YOLOv8m (Δ = +32.5 pp), recall of 89.80% vs. 53.10% (Δ = +36.7 pp), and F1 of 91.08% vs. 65.50% (Δ = +25.6 pp). All three detection classes surpassed the 90% mAP@50 threshold for YOLOv12m. These results validate the transformative impact of the R-ELAN backbone and Area Attention Mechanism on domain-specific traffic enforcement detection tasks, and confirm that high-quality public Kaggle datasets provide a reproducible and effective foundation for domain-specific model development without requiring proprietary data collection infrastructure
[1] J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi, "You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection," in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA, Jun. 2016, pp. 779–788. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.91 [2] G. Jocher, A. Chaurasia, and J. Qiu, "Ultralytics YOLOv8," GitHub Repository, Ultralytics Inc., 2023. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics [3] A. Wang et al., "YOLOv12: Attention-centric real-time object detectors," arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12524, Feb. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12524 [4] R. Saini, S. Kumar, V. Bansal, and P. Rawat, "Helmet detection on motorcyclists using image descriptors and classifiers," Transp. Res. C: Emerg. Technol., vol. 115, p. 102616, Jun. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102616 [5] V. Mandal and Y. Adu-Gyamfi, "Object detection and tracking algorithms for vehicle counting: A comparative analysis," J. Big Data, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 31, Mar. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s40537-022-00580-7 [6] A. Kumar, R. Sharma, and M. Patel, "Domain-specific fine-tuning of YOLO models for traffic violation detection," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Intell. Transp. Syst. (ITSC), Bilbao, Spain, Sep. 2023. [7] C. Henry, S. Y. Ahn, and S. Lee, "Road marking and license plate detection using convolutional neural networks," Sensors, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 364, Jan. 2021. DOI: 10.3390/s21020364 [8] A. Vaid, "Indian Helmet Detection Dataset," Kaggle, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/aryanvaid13/indian-helmet-detection-dataset [9] M. R. Arun, P. Krishnamoorthy, and R. Sundaram, "Deep learning based object detection in surveillance video," in Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Smart Electron. Commun. (ICOSEC), Trichy, India, 2023, pp. 1794–1801. DOI: 10.1109/ICOSEC58147.2023.10276262 [10] R. Laroca et al., "A robust real-time automatic license plate recognition based on the YOLO detector," in Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Neural Netw. (IJCNN), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Jul. 2018, pp. 1–9.
Publication Date
5/18/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...