Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM30969
Volume:
8 |
4 |
Apr 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The increasing integration of intelligent transportation systems has brought forth a critical need for accurate and efficient traffic sign detection algorithms. In this research, we conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of four prominent convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures—LeNet, ResNet, VGG, and a standard CNN model—for their performance in traffic sign detection. The evaluation is conducted on a diverse dataset, utilizing the German Traffic Signs Recognition Benchmark (GTSRB). Our study encompasses an in-depth examination of accuracy metrics and performance under varying conditions, such as challenging lighting, occlusion, and environmental complexities. The results demonstrate nuanced differences in accuracy and computational efficiency among the algorithms. LeNet exhibits notable improvements in real-time processing, while ResNet showcases enhanced accuracy, and VGG demonstrates robustness in challenging conditions. The findings provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each algorithm, aiding researchers and practitioners in selecting the most suitable model for specific traffic sign detection applications. This research contributes to advancing the field of computer vision in intelligent transportation systems, with implications for enhancing road safety and efficiency.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45398
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...