Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM43962
Volume:
9 |
4 |
Apr 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Sentiment analysis plays a crucial role in understanding public opinions on social media platforms like Twitter. This study performs a comparative analysis of three machine learning models—Bernoulli Naïve Bayes (BernoulliNB), Linear Support Vector Classifier (LinearSVC), and Linear Regression—for binary sentiment classification (positive vs. negative) using the Sentiment140 dataset. The dataset, which contains pre-labelled tweets, is preprocessed through text normalization, tokenization, and feature extraction using the TF-IDF vectorization method. The models are evaluated based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, along with confusion matrices and word clouds for qualitative insights. Our results indicate that model performance varies significantly depending on the feature representation and classification approach. The study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each model and provides insights into their effectiveness for large-scale Twitter sentiment analysis. This comparative evaluation aims to guide future research in selecting appropriate machine learning models for real-world sentiment analysis applications.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
8/3/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...