Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68396
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-10
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
FIRE TECHNOLOGY & SAFETY ENGINEERING
VIKRANT UNIVERSITY, GWALIOR
FIRE TECHNOLOGY & SAFETY ENGINEERING
VIKRANT UNIVERSITY, GWALIOR
Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is widely used as an industrial fuel because of its high energy content, ease of storage under pressure, and potential to reduce certain combustion-related emissions compared with conventional liquid fuels. However, its flammable nature, pressurised storage conditions, and potential for rapid vapour dispersion create significant fire, explosion, and occupational safety challenges in automotive industrial facilities. LPG-related hazards may arise during unloading, storage, transfer through pipelines, fuel dispensing, equipment operation, maintenance, and emergency response. This study proposes an integrated risk-assessment framework for evaluating LPG-related hazards across the fuel-handling lifecycle in automotive industrial operations. The methodology combines Hazard Identification (HAZID), Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), a risk matrix, and quantitative consequence assessment. Major accident scenarios considered include LPG leakage, flash fire, jet fire, vapour cloud explosion, and boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion (BLEVE). Environmental considerations include direct fuel releases, combustion emissions, and the potential consequences of accidental fires and explosions. A risk-prioritisation model is proposed to evaluate the severity, likelihood, and effectiveness of existing safeguards. The framework can support the development of targeted prevention strategies, emergency preparedness plans, and continuous safety improvement programmes. The proposed methodology requires validation using actual industrial inspection data, operating records, and site-specific consequence modelling before numerical risk-reduction claims can be made.
KEYWORDS
LPG handling, storage, and utilisation in automotive industrial facilities require an integrated approach to process safety, fire prevention, occupational protection, and environmental management. The principal challenge is not limited to preventing leaks; it also involves understanding how initiating events can develop into fires, explosions, operational disruptions, and environmental consequences. This paper proposes a comprehensive risk-assessment framework integrating HAZID, HAZOP, FMEA, qualitative risk ranking, and quantitative consequence analysis. The methodology connects equipment-level failure modes with major accident scenarios and provides a basis for prioritising preventive and mitigative safeguards. It also incorporates routine combustion emissions and accidental releases into the environmental assessment. The principal contribution is the proposed integration of lifecycle-based LPG hazard identification with risk-based decision-making and environmental evaluation. Its practical value will depend on validation using industrial operating data, engineering inspections, incident records, and appropriately selected consequence models. Future research should apply the framework to an automotive facility, calculate scenario-specific risk values, assess existing safety barriers, and compare baseline and post-intervention risk. Such an investigation could provide evidence-based recommendations for improving LPG system integrity, reducing accident potential, and strengthening environmental performance.
1. Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB). Technical Standards and Specifications Including Safety Standards for LPG Storage, Handling and Bottling Facilities Regulations, 2019, as amended.. 2. Government of India. The Gas Cylinders Rules, 2016. India Code. 3. Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organisation (PESO). Static and Mobile Pressure Vessels (Unfired) Rules, 2016: FAQs and guidance. 4. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). NFPA 58: Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code. 2024 edition. 5. Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. Safety Standards of LPG Cylinders. Press Information Bureau, 7 December 2023. 6. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS). Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 3rd edition, 2008. 7. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). IEC 61882: Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOP Studies)—Application Guide. Use the edition applicable to the study and confirm its current status before submission.
Publication Date
10/27/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...