Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM58737
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Abstract -The structural design of multi-storey residential buildings plays a crucial role in ensuring safety, serviceability, and cost-effectiveness. This study focuses on the comparative analysis and design of a G+6 reinforced concrete residential building using STAAD.Pro and ETABS software. The primary objective is to evaluate the structural behavior, load distribution, and design efficiency provided by these two widely used structural analysis tools. The building under consideration is designed in accordance with Indian Standard (IS) codes, including IS 456:2000 for reinforced concrete design, IS 875 (Part 1–5) for dead, live, wind, and seismic loads, and IS 1893:2016 for earthquake-resistant design. The study highlights the advantages and limitations of STAAD.Pro and ETABS in terms of analysis accuracy, design optimization, user interface, and time efficiency. The findings indicate that while both tools yield similar structural responses, ETABS offers enhanced capabilities for dynamic analysis and earthquake load modeling, whereas STAAD. Pro provides flexible modeling options for complex geometries. This research serves as a comprehensive reference for engineers and researchers in selecting appropriate structural analysis software and ensures compliance with IS codes for safe and economical design of G+6 residential buildings.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/3/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...