Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68407
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Computer engineering
sandip institute of technology and research centre
Computer engineering
sandip institute of technology and research centre
Computer engineering
sandip institute of technology and research centre
Computer engineering
sandip institute of technology and research centre
Computer engineering
sandip institute of technology and research centre
The increasing demand for digital storage has created challenges related to storage cost, centralized infrastructure, data availability, privacy, and dependence on large cloud service providers. Decentralized storage systems address some of these limitations by distributing data across multiple independent nodes, while blockchain can provide mechanisms for coordination, verification, identity, and incentives. More recently, Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePIN) have introduced a model in which participants contribute physical resources to decentralized networks and receive incentives for useful resource contribution. This paper examines the application of DePIN principles to decentralized shared storage, with particular focus on decentralized storage architectures, peer-to-peer data distribution, blockchain-based coordination, storage verification, incentive mechanisms, and security challenges. Existing technologies and approaches including IPFS, Filecoin, blockchain-based storage, and distributed storage networks are analyzed to identify their architectural characteristics, benefits, and limitations. Based on the literature synthesis, the paper identifies challenges related to storage-provider trust, data integrity, availability, resource verification, malicious nodes, and incentive management. A DePIN-based shared-storage architecture is proposed in which users can contribute unused storage capacity as storage nodes while blockchain-based mechanisms coordinate identity, verification, and incentives, and distributed storage mechanisms handle user data. The proposed approach provides a foundation for developing a secure and resilient peer-to-peer storage marketplace while keeping large data objects off-chain. The paper further defines a methodology, security considerations, evaluation metrics, limitations, and future research directions for validating the proposed system.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented a Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network (DePIN)-based shared storage architecture that enables secure and decentralized storage resource sharing through blockchain technology, distributed storage nodes, governance mechanisms, and incentive-driven participation. The study reviewed existing decentralized storage solutions and identified the need for a unified framework that integrates storage management, verification, governance, reputation management, and reward distribution within a single ecosystem [1], [3], [4]. To address this challenge, a layered architecture consisting of a User and Application Layer, API and Storage Management Layer, Blockchain and Smart Contract Layer, Governance Layer, Distributed Storage Layer, Verification and Security Layer, and Incentive Layer was proposed. The architecture separates large-scale data storage from blockchain coordination, allowing files to remain off-chain while blockchain technology manages storage agreements, verification records, governance activities, and incentive allocation. This approach improves scalability, transparency, security, and fault tolerance while maintaining decentralized accountability [1], [6], [8], [10]. The proposed methodology describes how storage providers contribute resources, how users store and retrieve files, how verification mechanisms ensure data availability, and how governance and incentive models support sustainable network participation. In addition, the evaluation framework provides a basis for assessing the performance, security, reliability, and economic viability of the proposed system. Overall, the proposed DePIN-based shared storage framework demonstrates the potential of decentralized infrastructure networks to provide secure, transparent, and community-driven storage services. As Web3 technologies continue to evolve, DePIN-based storage systems can play an important role in supporting future decentralized applications and digital services while reducing dependence on traditional centralized cloud infrastructures[1],[2],[11].
[1] M. Jiang, E. Liu, X. Qu, W. Ni, Z. Wei, and E. Hossain, “A survey of decentralized physical infrastructure network, research directions, and open challenges,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Early Access, 2026. [2] “Decentralized physical infrastructure networks: Backgrounds, architectures, open issues, and case studies,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Blockchain, 2025. [3] M. I. Khalid, I. Ehsan, A. K. Al-Ani, J. Iqbal, S. Hussain, S. S. Ullah, and N. Khan, “A comprehensive survey on blockchain-based decentralized storage networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 10995–11015, 2023. [4] M. M. Merlec and H. P. In, “Blockchain-based decentralized storage systems for sustainable data self-sovereignty: A comparative study,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 17, 2024. [5] T. V. Doan, Y. Psaras, J. Ott, and V. Bajpai, “Towards decentralised cloud storage with IPFS: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions,” 2022. [6] J. Benet and N. Greco, Filecoin: A Decentralized Storage Network. Protocol Labs, 2017. [7] Protocol Labs, “Filecoin and IPFS documentation.” [Online]. Available: https://docs.filecoin.io [8] Storj Labs Inc., Storj: A Decentralized Cloud Storage Network Framework, ver. 3.1, 2024. [9] Storj Labs Inc., V3 White Paper Executive Summary, 2024. [10] D. Vorick and L. Champine, Sia: Simple Decentralized Storage. Nebulous Inc., 2014.
Publication Date
10/27/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
3
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
8
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...