Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65012
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-13
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

IT Services
DXC Technologies
This paper looks at enterprise database capacity forecasting from a practical business-planning point of view. In large organisations, storage growth is not just a technical concern; it can affect procurement timing, budget approvals, service continuity, and operational risk. The proposed framework combines SARIMAX forecasting with selected business drivers and residual-based split conformal prediction. Instead of treating the forecast as one fixed future path, the approach turns it into a calibrated interval that reflects uncertainty from changing business volumes, retention policies, regulatory needs, and infrastructure lead times. By using historical forecast errors for calibration, the method presents capacity growth as a planning window rather than a single predicted date. For the evaluated 6.2-unit threshold, the framework gives a planning window from March 16, 2026, to May 3, 2026, with the central forecast crossing on April 9, 2026. This result shows how uncertainty-aware forecasting can support clearer and more defensible infrastructure investment decisions.
KEYWORDS
The central idea of this paper is simple: database planners need more than one expected capacity date. Using SARIMAX with selected business drivers and residual-based split conformal prediction, the study showed how a 6.2-unit threshold can be converted into a practical window from March 16, 2026, to May 3, 2026, with the central forecast falling on April 9, 2026. This range is the main outcome of the work. It gives infrastructure and business teams a better way to discuss procurement timing, budget approval, and capacity risk because it accepts that database growth cannot be predicted as one exact date. As discussed in Section 7, the next step is being explored as a small MVP or proof of concept, where planners can use a chatbot-style interface to change business assumptions and see how the conformal capacity window moves. This can form the basis for a continuing paper on agentic AI-supported capacity planning.
[1] R. J. Hyndman and G. Athanasopoulos, Forecasting: Principles and Practice, 3rd ed. Melbourne, Australia: OTexts, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://otexts.com/fpp3/. Accessed: Jun. 11, 2026. [2] V. Vovk, A. Gammerman, and G. Shafer, Algorithmic Learning in a Random World. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2005. [3] A. N. Angelopoulos and S. Bates, “A gentle introduction to conformal prediction and distribution-free uncertainty quantification,” arXiv:2107.07511, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.07511. Accessed: Jun. 11, 2026. [4] E. Tabassi, Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0), NIST AI 100-1. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Jan. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1. Accessed: Jun. 11, 2026. [5] IBM Corporation, “Capacity management and capacity planning concepts,” IBM Documentation. [Online]. Available: https://www.ibm.com/docs/. Accessed: Jun. 11, 2026. [6] Amazon Web Services, AWS Well-Architected Framework. Seattle, WA, USA: Amazon Web Services, Inc. [Online]. Available: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/wellarchitected/. Accessed: Jun. 11, 2026. [7] B. Lim, S. Ö. Arık, N. Loeff, and T. Pfister, “Temporal Fusion Transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1748–1764, Oct.–Dec. 2021. [8] J. Gawlikowski et al., “A survey of uncertainty in deep neural networks,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 56, pp. 1513–1589, 2023. [9] European Parliament and Council of the European Union, Regulation on Artificial Intelligence: European Union Artificial Intelligence Act. Brussels, Belgium: European Union, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/. Accessed: Jun. 11, 2026. [10] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD AI Principles. Paris, France: OECD. [Online]. Available: https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles. Accessed: Jun. 11, 2026.
Publication Date
6/15/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...