Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67466
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
CIvil Engineering
Sage University Indore
CIvil Engineering
Sage University Indore
CIvil Engineering
Sage University Indore
The growing demand for concrete has increased interest in supplementary cementitious materials that can reduce dependence on clinker while making use of locally available wastes. Corn cob ash (CCA), obtained by controlled combustion of corn cobs, has attracted attention because its composition can contain appreciable amounts of reactive silica and other oxides. However, the published evidence is not uniform: performance depends strongly on the source of the cob, combustion temperature, residence time, grinding, fineness, chemical composition, replacement level, water demand and curing regime. This paper critically reviews the use of CCA as a partial cement replacement in concrete, with particular attention to workability, compressive strength, durability, microstructural development, processing conditions and practical suitability. The review also relates the literature to the M.Tech experimental programme documented by the author, which used PPC-based M20 concrete, a 1:1.5:3 proportion, a nominal water–cement ratio of 0.55, CCA replacement levels up to 15%, and curing ages of 3, 7 and 28 days. The literature indicates that low replacement levels, commonly around 5–10% by mass of binder, are more consistently associated with acceptable fresh and hardened properties than high replacement levels. At the same time, recent studies show that untreated or poorly controlled CCA can contain high alkali or chloride contents and may behave less effectively than properly calcined ash. The central finding of this review is therefore not that CCA has one universal optimum percentage, but that its performance is process-dependent and must be established for each ash source through chemical, physical, strength and durability testing. Future research should standardize ash production, report complete chemical and physical characterization, evaluate long-term durability, and combine experimental optimization with life-cycle and cost assessment.
KEYWORDS
Corn cob ash has credible potential as a supplementary cementitious material, but its usefulness is conditional rather than automatic. The literature shows that CCA can contribute to sustainable concrete by reducing cement demand and valorizing agricultural residue, while properly processed ash can contribute to pozzolanic reaction and matrix refinement. At the same time, untreated or poorly controlled ash can have high alkali, chloride or unburnt-carbon contents and may reduce workability or compressive strength. Across the literature, low replacement levels around 5–10% are repeatedly identified as a practical range for further investigation, although the optimum cannot be fixed independently of ash source, processing, cement type and mixture design. The author's M.Tech work, which uses PPC-based M20 concrete and investigates CCA replacement up to 15%, fits within this research direction. Its reported observation that a low replacement level performs favorably is consistent with the broader literature, but it should remain a system-specific conclusion. The most important requirement for future publication-quality work is therefore reproducibility. A paper should allow another researcher to reproduce the ash, understand its chemistry and fineness, reproduce the concrete mixture, and evaluate both strength and durability. If these details are controlled, CCA can move from a general waste-utilization concept toward a technically defensible supplementary cementitious material for selected concrete applications.
1. Neville, A. M. (2012). Properties of Concrete. 5th ed. Pearson/Trans-Atlantic Publications. 2. Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2014). Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill Education. 3. Scrivener, K. L., John, V. M., & Gartner, E. M. (2018). Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO₂ cement-based materials industry. Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015 4. Ahmad, J., Arbili, M. M., Alabduljabbar, H., & Deifalla, A. F. (2023). Concrete made with partially substitution corn cob ash: A review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 18, e02100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02100 5. Adesanya, D. A., & Raheem, A. A. (2009). Development of corn cob ash blended cement. Construction and Building Materials, 23(1), 347–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.013 6. Adesanya, D. A., & Raheem, A. A. (2009). A study of the workability and compressive strength characteristics of corn cob ash blended cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 23(1), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.12.004 7. Adesanya, D. A., & Raheem, A. A. (2010). A study of the permeability and acid attack of corn cob ash blended cements. Construction and Building Materials, 24(3), 403–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.001 8. Adesanya, D. A. (1996). Evaluation of blended cement mortar, concrete and stabilized earth made from ordinary Portland cement and corn cob ash. Construction and Building Materials, 10(6), 451–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(96)00001-3 9. Olafusi, O. S., & Olutoge, F. A. (2012). Strength properties of corn cob ash concrete. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(2), 297–301. 10. Mujedu, K. A., Adebara, S. A., & Lamidi, I. O. (2014). The use of corn cob ash and saw dust ash as cement replacement in concrete works. International Journal of Engineering and Science, 3(4), 22–28.
Publication Date
9/25/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...