Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67466

Corn Cob Ash as a Partial Cement Replacement in Concrete: A Critical Review of Processing, Fresh Properties, Strength, Durability and Research Needs

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67466

Volume:

10 |

9 |

Sep 2026

Pages:

1-9

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
Not assigned

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

PP

Praveen Purohit

CIvil Engineering

Sage University Indore

Download Author Certificate
PRY

Prof. Rishab Yadav

CIvil Engineering

Sage University Indore

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

PPR

Prof. Priyanka Rajput

CIvil Engineering

Sage University Indore

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

The growing demand for concrete has increased interest in supplementary cementitious materials that can reduce dependence on clinker while making use of locally available wastes. Corn cob ash (CCA), obtained by controlled combustion of corn cobs, has attracted attention because its composition can contain appreciable amounts of reactive silica and other oxides. However, the published evidence is not uniform: performance depends strongly on the source of the cob, combustion temperature, residence time, grinding, fineness, chemical composition, replacement level, water demand and curing regime. This paper critically reviews the use of CCA as a partial cement replacement in concrete, with particular attention to workability, compressive strength, durability, microstructural development, processing conditions and practical suitability. The review also relates the literature to the M.Tech experimental programme documented by the author, which used PPC-based M20 concrete, a 1:1.5:3 proportion, a nominal water–cement ratio of 0.55, CCA replacement levels up to 15%, and curing ages of 3, 7 and 28 days. The literature indicates that low replacement levels, commonly around 5–10% by mass of binder, are more consistently associated with acceptable fresh and hardened properties than high replacement levels. At the same time, recent studies show that untreated or poorly controlled CCA can contain high alkali or chloride contents and may behave less effectively than properly calcined ash. The central finding of this review is therefore not that CCA has one universal optimum percentage, but that its performance is process-dependent and must be established for each ash source through chemical, physical, strength and durability testing. Future research should standardize ash production, report complete chemical and physical characterization, evaluate long-term durability, and combine experimental optimization with life-cycle and cost assessment.

KEYWORDS

Corn cob ash; supplementary cementitious material; partial cement replacement; pozzolanic material; concrete; compressive strength; workability; durability; sustainable construction.

Cite This Article

Praveen Purohit, Prof. Rishab Yadav, Prof. Priyanka Rajput, "Corn Cob Ash as a Partial Cement Replacement in Concrete: A Critical Review of Processing, Fresh Properties, Strength, Durability and Research Needs," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-9, Sep 2026.

Full Article/Conclusion

Corn cob ash has credible potential as a supplementary cementitious material, but its usefulness is conditional rather than automatic. The literature shows that CCA can contribute to sustainable concrete by reducing cement demand and valorizing agricultural residue, while properly processed ash can contribute to pozzolanic reaction and matrix refinement. At the same time, untreated or poorly controlled ash can have high alkali, chloride or unburnt-carbon contents and may reduce workability or compressive strength. Across the literature, low replacement levels around 5–10% are repeatedly identified as a practical range for further investigation, although the optimum cannot be fixed independently of ash source, processing, cement type and mixture design. The author's M.Tech work, which uses PPC-based M20 concrete and investigates CCA replacement up to 15%, fits within this research direction. Its reported observation that a low replacement level performs favorably is consistent with the broader literature, but it should remain a system-specific conclusion. The most important requirement for future publication-quality work is therefore reproducibility. A paper should allow another researcher to reproduce the ash, understand its chemistry and fineness, reproduce the concrete mixture, and evaluate both strength and durability. If these details are controlled, CCA can move from a general waste-utilization concept toward a technically defensible supplementary cementitious material for selected concrete applications.

References

1.      Neville, A. M. (2012). Properties of Concrete. 5th ed. Pearson/Trans-Atlantic Publications. 2.      Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2014). Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill Education. 3.      Scrivener, K. L., John, V. M., & Gartner, E. M. (2018). Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO₂ cement-based materials industry. Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015 4.      Ahmad, J., Arbili, M. M., Alabduljabbar, H., & Deifalla, A. F. (2023). Concrete made with partially substitution corn cob ash: A review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 18, e02100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02100 5.      Adesanya, D. A., & Raheem, A. A. (2009). Development of corn cob ash blended cement. Construction and Building Materials, 23(1), 347–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.013 6.      Adesanya, D. A., & Raheem, A. A. (2009). A study of the workability and compressive strength characteristics of corn cob ash blended cement concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 23(1), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.12.004 7.      Adesanya, D. A., & Raheem, A. A. (2010). A study of the permeability and acid attack of corn cob ash blended cements. Construction and Building Materials, 24(3), 403–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.001 8.      Adesanya, D. A. (1996). Evaluation of blended cement mortar, concrete and stabilized earth made from ordinary Portland cement and corn cob ash. Construction and Building Materials, 10(6), 451–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(96)00001-3 9.      Olafusi, O. S., & Olutoge, F. A. (2012). Strength properties of corn cob ash concrete. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(2), 297–301. 10.      Mujedu, K. A., Adebara, S. A., & Lamidi, I. O. (2014). The use of corn cob ash and saw dust ash as cement replacement in concrete works. International Journal of Engineering and Science, 3(4), 22–28.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/25/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

4

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...