Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM64962

Corruption, Governance, and Institutional Capacity: India's Reform Deficit from 2030 to 2047

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM64962

Volume:

10 |

6 |

Jun 2026

Pages:

1-10

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM64962

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Rachit Baijal

Rachit Baijal

Director General

Artha-Niti Institute for Governance

Download Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

This paper examines India's likely anti-corruption and governance reform deficit during the strategic window from 2030 to 2047, when the country will attempt to combine high economic growth, social protection, infrastructure expansion and democratic legitimacy. The paper uses a prospective institutional analysis based on present reform trajectories, comparative governance indicators, and sectoral risk mapping. It argues that India has built important transparency and delivery instruments, including digital procurement, direct benefit transfers, financial management platforms, grievance systems, audit institutions and statutory anti-corruption bodies. However, these reforms remain uneven because enforcement capacity, procurement law, whistle-blower protection, political finance transparency, local government capacity, data governance, judicial timeliness and federal coordination have not matured at the same pace. The central finding is that corruption between 2030 and 2047 is likely to mutate from petty extraction to higher-order capture of contracts, platforms, environmental approvals, welfare data and regulatory discretion unless institutional capacity is expanded. The paper proposes a 2047 integrity architecture built around independent enforcement, open contracting, proactive disclosure, protected reporting, algorithmic auditability, professional civil services, social accountability and state-level capacity compacts.

KEYWORDS

Corruption Governance Institutional Capacity India 2047 Public Integrity Administrative Reform.

Cite This Article

Rachit Baijal, "Corruption, Governance, and Institutional Capacity: India's Reform Deficit from 2030 to 2047," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1-10, Jun 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM64962

Full Article/Conclusion

India has built important tools for transparency, welfare efficiency, digital finance, procurement and grievance redress. These reforms should be recognised as significant. Yet the period from 2030 to 2047 will test whether these tools can become institutions. The central challenge is not whether India has anti-corruption laws or digital platforms; it is whether those laws and platforms are backed by autonomy, expertise, open data, timely adjudication, protected reporting, local capacity and credible sanctions. If the reform deficit persists, corruption is likely to become less visible but more systemic. Petty bribery may decline in some services, while high-value capture in procurement, land, climate finance, regulation and digital platforms may expand. If India treats corruption control as a core component of state capacity, however, the country can build an integrity architecture suited to its 2047 ambitions. The policy choice is clear: corruption can be managed episodically through scandal response, or it can be governed structurally through institutions designed for prevention, detection, enforcement and democratic accountability. The paper therefore recommends a 2047 reform agenda built around open contracting, independent oversight, operational whistle-blower protection, RTI revival, algorithmic auditability, federal capacity compacts, fast-track integrity adjudication and transparent political finance. India's centenary will be judged not only by the size of its economy but by the quality of its public institutions. A developed India must also be an accountable India.

References

1. Transparency International. Corruption Perceptions Index 2024. Berlin: Transparency International, 2025. Available at: transparency.org/en/cpi/2024. 2. Transparency International. India Country Profile - Corruption Perceptions Index. Available at: transparency.org/en/countries/india. 3. World Bank. Worldwide Governance Indicators, 2025 Revision. Washington, DC: World Bank Group, 2025. Available at: worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators. 4. Central Vigilance Commission. Annual Reports. Government of India. Available at: cvc.gov.in/annualreport. 5. Lokpal of India. Annual Reports, Complaint Rules and Institutional Information. Available at: lokpal.gov.in. 6. Press Information Bureau. Government e Marketplace Surpasses Rs. 5 Lakh Crore GMV Before FY 2024-25 Year-End. Ministry of Commerce and Industry, 17 March 2025. 7. Public Financial Management System. About PFMS. Office of Controller General of Accounts, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. Available at: pfms.nic.in. 8. Press Information Bureau. DARPG Released 29th CPGRAMS Report for States/UTs of December 2024. Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, 31 January 2025. 9. Press Information Bureau. India's DBT: Boosting Welfare Efficiency. Ministry of Finance, 21 April 2025. 10. Department of Personnel and Training. The Right to Information Act, 2005 (Updated). Government of India.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

6/14/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...