Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM20890
Volume:
7 |
5 |
May 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This research paper investigates the cost-effectiveness of using Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) blocks as an alternative to traditional building materials such as red bricks. The study reviews the properties of AAC blocks in terms of their low density, porosity and lower water absorption. The research presents a cost comparison between AAC blocks and red bricks for a multi-storeyed structure. This comparison is carried out for a G+6 residential building wherein the quantities of steel and concrete are calculated after analysing the structure using STAAD Pro. The paper also presents a comparison between the physical properties of AAC blocks and red bricks. AAC blocks prove beneficial in a number of ways as they reduce the dead load acting on the structure as a result of which the sections of corresponding beams and columns are reduced. Moreover, the production process of these blocks is eco-friendly. The use of AAC blocks reduces on-site losses and these blocks can be recycled unlike most other building materials. The expenses incurred on the quantities of concrete, steel and other materials, labour, transport, etc. are reduced. This reduction in cost for the building under consideration is about 16 – 18% which amounts to approximately Rs 21.5 lakhs
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/4/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...