Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67982
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Mittal school of business
Lovely Professional University
Mittal school of business
Lovely Professional University
Mittal school of business
Lovely Professional University
Mittal school of business
Lovely Professional University
The capital structure, cost of capital, are important financial decisions in industries that require high investment in capital, like the Indian power sector. The study aims at understanding the impact of the financing structure on the cost of capital of a power sector company over the five-year period (FY2021-22 to FY2025-26). The cost of debt is calculated based on the finance cost, average debt and the effective tax rate, and the cost of equity is calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model. The WACC is determined using the book-value weights of debt and equity. The market value of the company is compared to two sector peers, having the same beta, to reflect the impact of financing structure and borrowing costs. The analysis reveals that there was a significant change in the company's capital structure during the period, with debt making up a substantial proportion of the total capital. The debt usage resulted in a reduction in the company's WACC as compared to its sector peers, however, it also increased the financing cost of the companies in FY2025-26. The results indicate that the trade-off between tax benefits from debt and financial burden due to increasing leverage levels.
KEYWORDS
There is a significant shift in the financing of Company X over the 5 years as indicated in the comparison. Company X's debt weight is 33.80%, whereas other peers had an average debt weight of ~70% in FY20221-22. Its higher WACC of 11.67% is a result of the fact that it relies more on equity than do the other companies, Peer A with an equity WACC of 8.86% and Peer B with an equity WACC of 7.99%. Over the next few years, the financing mix shifted toward more debt for Company X. While, the peers, had a more limited leverage range. Their cost of debt stayed consistent between 7.56%-8.69% for Peer A and 7.76%-8.67% for Peer B, compared to the cost of debt for Company X, which was more volatile. Throughout the change of financing structure, Company X's WACC significantly decreased. It has fallen from 11.67% in FY2021-22 to 8.32% in FY2022-23 and stayed broadly in the range of the two peers since then. The situation changed a little in FY2025-26 however, where the WACC of the Company X rose to 8.96% while the WACC of Peer A and Peer B rose to 8.60% and 8.90% respectively.
Chakrabarti, A., & Chakrabarti, A. (2019). The capital structure puzzle evidence from Indian energy sector. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 13(1). Desai, R. (2020). Factors affecting financing decision of Indian power & energy sector and testing of capital structure theories: Panel data analysis. Indonesian Management and Accounting Research, 19(1). Handoo, A., & Sharma, K. (2014). A study on determinants of capital structure in India. IIMB Management Review, 26(3), 170-182. RBSA Advisors. (2020). Cost of capital in India (4th ed.). RBSA Advisors. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. The American Economic Review, 53(3), 433-443. Sinha, A. (2017). An enquiry into effect of capital structure on firm value: A study of power sector companies in India. Parikalpana: KIIT Journal of Management, 13(2), 107-117. Tupe, S. (2020). A study of capital structure of Indian power generation and supply firms: Unbalanced panel data. Asian Development Policy Review, 8(2), 128-140. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2002). Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. The Review of Financial Studies, 15(1), 1–33. Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2003). Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(2), 217–248. Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 575–592. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221. Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421–1460.
Publication Date
10/14/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...