Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67833

Cost of Capital Dynamics A Five-Year Trend and Peer Benchmarking Study

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67833

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-12

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67833

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

SR

Shewani Rana

Mangement

Lovely professional university

Download Author Certificate
RSS

Ruhani Singh Sawant

Mangement

Lovely professional university

Download Co-Author Certificate
AKS

Ankit Kumar Sharma

Mangement

Lovely professional university

Download Co-Author Certificate
PKG

Prawin Kumar Gupta

Mangement

Lovely professional university

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

DRB

Dr. Rohit Bansal

Mangement

Lovely professional university

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

This paper examines the cost of capital of Dabur India Ltd., a leading Indian FMCG and Ayurvedic products company, over FY2022–FY2026 and benchmarks it against Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL) and Marico Ltd. Using consolidated financial statements and National Stock Exchange (NSE) closing prices, the study computes the after-tax cost of debt, the cost of equity through the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), and the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) using market-value weights. Equity betas are estimated by ordinary least squares on 59 monthly returns (April 2021–March 2026) against the Nifty 50, giving 0.83 for Dabur, 0.81 for HUL, and 0.62 for Marico. Dabur’s WACC remained in a narrow 11.55–12.20% band. The movement is driven almost entirely by the cost of equity, since equity makes up more than 98% of its market-value capital structure in every year. The cost of debt, though volatile, never contributes more than 0.17 percentage points to WACC. All three firms rely almost entirely on equity. Dabur’s and HUL’s WACCs differ by less than 0.10 percentage points, while Marico’s is about 1.2 percentage points lower, a gap explained by beta rather than leverage. The paper concludes with implications for capital budgeting hurdle rates and Dabur’s future financing mix.

KEYWORDS

Cost of Capital; Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC); Cost of Equity; Cost of Debt; Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM); Beta; Capital Structure; Peer Benchmarking; Capital Budgeting.

Cite This Article

Shewani Rana, Ruhani Singh Sawant, Ankit Kumar Sharma, Prawin Kumar Gupta, Dr. Rohit Bansal, "Cost of Capital Dynamics A Five-Year Trend and Peer Benchmarking Study," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-12, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67833

Full Article/Conclusion

Over FY2022–FY2026, Dabur India Ltd. maintained a stable WACC of 11.55%–12.20%, the result of an equity-dominated capital structure in which debt never exceeded 1.74% of the market value. The cost of equity, not the cost of debt, is the primary determinant of Dabur’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Its year-on-year movement is driven by risk-free rates. Its level depends on a beta of 0.83, which places Dabur’s cost of capital slightly above HUL’s and approximately 1.2 percentage points above Marico’s.   Regarding financing strategy, Dabur’s conservative leverage leaves room to raise low-cost debt for future growth capital expenditure or acquisitions (such as the ongoing Dabur–Sesa Care amalgamation). Because debt’s weight is small and interest is tax-deductible, this would not materially raise the blended cost of capital. For capital budgeting, the computed WACC of approximately 11.5–12.2% is the minimum hurdle rate that Dabur should require for new investments financed at its current blended cost of capital. Because this figure is almost entirely an equity cost, project appraisal should focus on the assumptions embedded in Ke, mainly the beta estimate and equity risk premium. Project NPVs should also be tested against plausible alternatives, such as the 0.65 beta obtained when the March 2026 selloff is excluded.

References

•            Bhuvanashree, & Reddy, R. (2025). Evaluating the impact of capital structure on firms performance. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(3). https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/3/49714.pdf •            Chadha, S., & Sharma, A. K. (2015). Capital structure and firm performance: Empirical evidence from India. Vision, 19(4), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262915610852 •            Dabur India Limited. (2024). Annual report 2023-24. https://www.bseindia.com/xml-data/corpfiling/AttachHis/b6f3ff71-f4ec-428e-a42f-7cb240b20049.pdf •            Dabur India Limited. (2025). Annual report 2024-25. https://www.bseindia.com/xml-data/corpfiling/AttachHis/adf0f46e-1909-419e-8bae-c6925bc09ca3.pdf •            Dabur India Limited. (2026). Annual report 2025-26. https://www.bseindia.com/xml-data/corpfiling/AttachHis/81d939d7-ea85-443b-98c5-934c71afa68c.pdf •            Damodaran, A. (2023). Country default spreads and risk premiums. NYU Stern School of Business. https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/ •            Dhanya, P., & Tharani, U. P. (2023). A study on financial performance of Dabur India Limited. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 5(4). https://www.irjmets.com/uploadedfiles/paper/issue_4_april_2023/36495/final/fin_irjmets1682184761.pdf •            Ghayas, A. (2020). A study on the determinants of capital structure: Evidence from India. IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 26(3), 47–59. •            Ghayas, A., Khan, T. F., & Sarim, M. (2025). The determinants of capital structure in Indian firms: Does industry matter? International Journal of Business Excellence, 36(2), 149–171.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/12/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

18

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...