Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67833
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-12
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Mangement
Lovely professional university
Mangement
Lovely professional university
Mangement
Lovely professional university
Mangement
Lovely professional university
Mangement
Lovely professional university
This paper examines the cost of capital of Dabur India Ltd., a leading Indian FMCG and Ayurvedic products company, over FY2022–FY2026 and benchmarks it against Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL) and Marico Ltd. Using consolidated financial statements and National Stock Exchange (NSE) closing prices, the study computes the after-tax cost of debt, the cost of equity through the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), and the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) using market-value weights. Equity betas are estimated by ordinary least squares on 59 monthly returns (April 2021–March 2026) against the Nifty 50, giving 0.83 for Dabur, 0.81 for HUL, and 0.62 for Marico. Dabur’s WACC remained in a narrow 11.55–12.20% band. The movement is driven almost entirely by the cost of equity, since equity makes up more than 98% of its market-value capital structure in every year. The cost of debt, though volatile, never contributes more than 0.17 percentage points to WACC. All three firms rely almost entirely on equity. Dabur’s and HUL’s WACCs differ by less than 0.10 percentage points, while Marico’s is about 1.2 percentage points lower, a gap explained by beta rather than leverage. The paper concludes with implications for capital budgeting hurdle rates and Dabur’s future financing mix.
KEYWORDS
Over FY2022–FY2026, Dabur India Ltd. maintained a stable WACC of 11.55%–12.20%, the result of an equity-dominated capital structure in which debt never exceeded 1.74% of the market value. The cost of equity, not the cost of debt, is the primary determinant of Dabur’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Its year-on-year movement is driven by risk-free rates. Its level depends on a beta of 0.83, which places Dabur’s cost of capital slightly above HUL’s and approximately 1.2 percentage points above Marico’s. Regarding financing strategy, Dabur’s conservative leverage leaves room to raise low-cost debt for future growth capital expenditure or acquisitions (such as the ongoing Dabur–Sesa Care amalgamation). Because debt’s weight is small and interest is tax-deductible, this would not materially raise the blended cost of capital. For capital budgeting, the computed WACC of approximately 11.5–12.2% is the minimum hurdle rate that Dabur should require for new investments financed at its current blended cost of capital. Because this figure is almost entirely an equity cost, project appraisal should focus on the assumptions embedded in Ke, mainly the beta estimate and equity risk premium. Project NPVs should also be tested against plausible alternatives, such as the 0.65 beta obtained when the March 2026 selloff is excluded.
• Bhuvanashree, & Reddy, R. (2025). Evaluating the impact of capital structure on firms performance. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(3). https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/3/49714.pdf • Chadha, S., & Sharma, A. K. (2015). Capital structure and firm performance: Empirical evidence from India. Vision, 19(4), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262915610852 • Dabur India Limited. (2024). Annual report 2023-24. https://www.bseindia.com/xml-data/corpfiling/AttachHis/b6f3ff71-f4ec-428e-a42f-7cb240b20049.pdf • Dabur India Limited. (2025). Annual report 2024-25. https://www.bseindia.com/xml-data/corpfiling/AttachHis/adf0f46e-1909-419e-8bae-c6925bc09ca3.pdf • Dabur India Limited. (2026). Annual report 2025-26. https://www.bseindia.com/xml-data/corpfiling/AttachHis/81d939d7-ea85-443b-98c5-934c71afa68c.pdf • Damodaran, A. (2023). Country default spreads and risk premiums. NYU Stern School of Business. https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/ • Dhanya, P., & Tharani, U. P. (2023). A study on financial performance of Dabur India Limited. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 5(4). https://www.irjmets.com/uploadedfiles/paper/issue_4_april_2023/36495/final/fin_irjmets1682184761.pdf • Ghayas, A. (2020). A study on the determinants of capital structure: Evidence from India. IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 26(3), 47–59. • Ghayas, A., Khan, T. F., & Sarim, M. (2025). The determinants of capital structure in Indian firms: Does industry matter? International Journal of Business Excellence, 36(2), 149–171.
Publication Date
10/12/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
18
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...