Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64213
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department Of Computer Science
Oriental University Indore, MP, India
Department Of Computer Science
Oriental University Indore, MP, India
- Legal documents are often lengthy, complex, and difficult to analyze manually due to their unstructured nature and technical language. This paper presents CourtSense for Case Analysis, an intelligent legal document analysis system developed using Natural Language Processing (NLP) and deep learning techniques. The proposed system is designed to automate important legal tasks such as document summarization, case outcome prediction, and similar case retrieval. The system accepts legal content in the form of PDF files, direct text input, or web URLs. Extracted text is preprocessed using cleaning and normalization techniques to remove unnecessary patterns and improve text quality. Since transformer-based models have token limitations, a chunking approach similar to a sliding window mechanism is used to process long legal documents without losing contextual information. The T5 transformer model is utilized to generate concise summaries, while a fine-tuned LegalBERT model is used for predicting legal outcomes with confidence scores. The system also identifies key legal issues and jurisdiction-related information from the input text. In addition, CourtSense provides similar case suggestions using a search-based retrieval mechanism, with future scope for semantic retrieval using dense vector embeddings. The application is implemented using Flask and PyTorch, providing a scalable and user-friendly interface for legal analysis. Experimental evaluation can be performed using ROUGE and METEOR metrics for summarization, and Precision, Recall, and F1-score for prediction tasks. The proposed system aims to reduce manual effort, improve efficiency, and support intelligent decision-making in legal workflows through automated document understanding and analysis.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented CourtSense for Case Analysis, a legal document analysis system developed using Natural Language Processing (NLP) and deep learning techniques. The system utilizes transformer-based models such as T5 and LegalBERT for legal document summarization, outcome prediction, and similar case retrieval. A chunk-based processing approach is used to handle lengthy legal documents efficiently. The proposed system helps reduce manual effort, improves legal document analysis, and provides a scalable solution for intelligent legal assistance and decision-making.
[1] J. Devlin, M. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding,” Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2019, pp. 4171-4186. [2] I. Chalkidis, M. Fergadiotis, P. Malakasiotis, and I. Androutsopoulos, “LEGAL-BERT: The Muppets Straight Out of Law School,” Findings of EMNLP, 2020, pp. 2898-2904. [3] C. Raffel, N. Shazeer, A. Roberts, et al., “Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 21, no. 140, 2020, pp. 1-67. [4] T. Wolf, L. Debut, V. Sanh, et al., “Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing,” Proceedings of EMNLP: System Demonstrations, 2020, pp. 38-45. [5] A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, et al., “Attention Is All You Need,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 30, 2017, pp. 5998-6008.
Publication Date
5/28/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...