Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREMWP027
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
A pronounced contradiction defines the contemporary technological moment: as machine-based systems grow increasingly adept at replicating and even surpassing narrow human cognitive functions, the demand for authentic human reasoning—disciplined, reflective, and epistemically grounded—has grown rather than receded. This study investigates the evolving relationship between critical and logical thinking on one side, and artificial intelligence (AI) on the other, positing that these two domains are neither rivals nor substitutes but deeply interdependent forces shaping the future of knowledge, decision-making, and societal governance. Drawing on perspectives from cognitive science, computer engineering, philosophy of mind, and technology ethics, the paper examines how logical frameworks have influenced the architecture of AI systems, how the deployment of machine intelligence reshapes human epistemic practices, and how thoughtfully designed human-AI partnerships can yield outcomes that neither human nor machine could achieve independently. The paper introduces the Critical AI Development Cycle (CADC)—an original five-phase model that situates epistemic responsibility at the center of AI design and deployment. Additionally, domain-specific analyses in medical diagnostics, cybersecurity, and educational technology demonstrate the practical stakes of this integration. The central thesis advanced here is that critical thinking is not peripheral to the AI revolution—it is the indispensable compass by which that revolution must be navigated.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/3/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...