Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66724
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of MBA & Research Centre
Surana College (Autonomous)
Professor, Department of MBA & Research Centre,
Surana College (Autonomous), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
This study examines customer payment preferences for premium products purchased in multi-brand retail stores in Bangalore, India, and the roles that convenience, perceived security, and customer age play in shaping those preferences. A descriptive-analytical research design was employed, and primary data were collected through a structured questionnaire administered to 190 respondents selected via convenience sampling. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha, multiple regression, Pearson correlation, and one-way ANOVA. UPI emerged as the dominant payment method, used by 60.5% of respondents and preferred by 76.8% among digital options, while cash retained a meaningful share (30.0%). Convenience significantly and positively predicted payment preference (β = 0.491, p < .001), whereas perceived security did not (β = -0.015, p = .838), with the model explaining a modest share of variance (R² = 0.225, F = 27.16, p < .001). The availability of multiple payment options was weakly but significantly correlated with customer satisfaction (r = 0.236, p < .05). Age significantly differentiated the tendency to vary payment method by purchase value (F = 285.06, p < .001). The findings indicate that convenience-driven adoption, rather than security concerns, now governs digital payment behaviour among urban Indian consumers purchasing premium goods.
KEYWORDS
The present study examined customer payment preference for premium products among 190 consumers in multi-brand retail stores in Bangalore. The findings confirm that UPI has overtaken cash as the dominant payment method (60.5% overall use; 76.8% preference among digital users), while cash retains a durable minority share (30.0%). Convenience significantly and positively predicted payment preference (β = 0.491, p < .001), while perceived security did not (β = -0.015, p = .838), though the model explained only a modest share of variance (R² = 0.225), suggesting other unmeasured factors also contribute to preference formation. The availability of multiple payment options was weakly but significantly correlated with satisfaction (r = 0.236, p < .05), and age significantly differentiated payment behaviour by purchase value (F = 285.06, p < .001). These findings suggest that digital payment preference in this market is now driven primarily by speed and convenience rather than security considerations, which appear to function as a baseline expectation rather than an active decision driver among UPI-experienced consumers. Retailers should therefore prioritise UPI at checkout, retain a fully staffed cash option, invest in optimising the two dominant methods rather than expanding into lower-uptake options, and differentiate service by age — promoting self-service UPI checkout to younger shoppers while offering staff-assisted support to older customers. Overall, this study contributes to the growing body of literature on digital payment adoption and consumer behaviour by providing empirical evidence from an emerging urban market in India, focused specifically on premium-product purchases in multi-brand retail. The findings offer practical insights for retailers, banks, and payment providers seeking to design evidence-based payment strategies for the Bangalore market.
Ahmed, W., Farooq, O., & Shahzaib, R. (2025). The rise of digital wallets: Customer trust, security concerns, and adoption in retail transactions. Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3),337-350.https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v4i3.171 Basu, R., & Sondhi, N. (2021). Online versus offline: preferred retail choice for premium brand purchase. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(10), 1447-1463. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-05-2020-0181 Eriksson, N., Gökhan, A., & Stenius, M. (2021). A qualitative study of consumer resistance to mobile payments for in-store purchases. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 634-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.212 Junadi, S. (2015). A model of factors influencing consumer’s intention to use e-payment system in Indonesia. Procedia Computer Science, 59, 214-220.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.557 Kumar, A. S., & Palanisamy, Y. A. (2019). Examining the consumers' preference towards adopting the mobile payment system. International Journal of Electronic Finance, 9(4), 268-286. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEF.2019.104071 Sombultawee, K., & Wattanatorn, W. (2022). The impact of trust on purchase intention through omnichannel retailing. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 19(4), 513-532. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-06-2021-0196 Widayat, W., & Masudin, I. (2023). Qr-code-based payment. Does the consumer intend to adopt a retail buying transaction?. Banks and Bank Systems, 18(3), 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.18(3).2023.01 Wu, L. W., & Tang, Y. C. (2022). Mobile payment in omnichannel retailing: dynamics between trust and loyalty transfer processes. Internet Research, 32(6), 1783-1805. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19020042 Zehra, F., Khan, F. S., Mazhar, S. S., Akhlaque, N., Haque, E., & Singh, A. (2024). Exploring consumer preferences and behaviour toward digital payment gateways in India. Int. J. Exp. Res. Rev, 41, 158-167. https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2024.v41spl.013
Publication Date
8/13/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...