Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM51787
Volume:
9 |
8 |
Aug 2025
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Commerce
Government Degree College, Kukatpally, Hyderabad
The increasing use of digital technologies, social media, online banking, and digital payment applications has exposed undergraduate students to various cyber threats. This study examined cybercrime and cyber law awareness among BA, B.Com., and B.Sc. students in a government degree college. A quantitative, cross-sectional research design was adopted, and the analysis covered 278 students: 63 BA students, 117 B.Com. Students, and 98 B.Sc. students. A structured questionnaire assessed awareness of common cybercrimes and knowledge of cyber laws through 16 objective questions, with one mark awarded for each correct answer. Descriptive statistics and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare awareness scores across the three courses. Based on the summary statistics supplied, B.Sc. students recorded the highest mean awareness score (10.80 out of 16), followed by B.Com. students (9.73) and BA students (8.58). The ANOVA yielded F(2, 275) = 20.961, p < 0.001, indicating a statistically significant difference among the course-wise mean scores. The findings highlight the importance of strengthening cyber safety education in higher education institutions. The reported numerical results were calculated from the original data with verified statistics.
KEYWORDS
The study examined differences in cybercrime and cyber law awareness scores among BA, B.Com. and B.Sc. students at Government Degree College, Kukatpally. The one-way ANOVA indicated an overall difference in mean awareness scores across the three academic groups. The magnitude of the association was assessed using eta-squared, while post-hoc comparisons are required to identify the specific groups that differ significantly. The findings may inform the design of cyber safety awareness programmes in higher education. However, conclusions should be interpreted in light of the study's sampling method, the scope of the knowledge assessment and its single-institution setting. The analysis demonstrates the importance of comparing group means using both between-course and within-course variation. The within-course error term represents differences among students within the same course and provides the reference against which the differences between course means are assessed. The findings highlight the importance of structured cybercrime and cyber law awareness programmes in higher education. Nevertheless, the statistical results must be verified using the original student-level responses, and post-hoc comparisons should be conducted before definitive conclusions are drawn about differences between particular courses. Future studies involving multiple colleges and additional explanatory variables could provide a broader understanding of cybercrime awareness and digital safety practices among undergraduate students.
1. Government of India. (2000). The Information Technology Act, 2000, as amended. India Code. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/ 2. Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In). Cyber security directions, advisories, and incident-response resources. https://www.cert-in.org.in/ 3. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal. https://cybercrime.gov.in/ 4. National Crime Records Bureau. Crime in India reports. https://www.ncrb.gov.in/ 5. Tripathy, S. S. (2024). A comprehensive survey of cybercrimes in India over the last decade. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 13(1), 2360–2374. 6. Santhosh, T., & Thiyagu, K. (2022). Cyber safety and security awareness initiatives in India – A systematic review. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 42–50. 7. Naren, N., & Gupta, K. (2026). Rethinking India’s cybercrime law: From Information Technology Act to emerging threats in a global context. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology. 8. Reddy, V. P., Reddy, J. T. P., Reddy, K. A. K., & Lakshmi, K. M. V. (2026). Comprehensive systematic review and critical evaluation of AI-driven cybercrime detection, eFIR systems, and legal frameworks in Indian policing. International Journal of Computer Science Engineering Techniques, 10(5), 262–265. 9. Khan, M., & Sharma, S. K. (2025). Unveiling digital deceptions: A holistic analysis of online frauds in India and the role of cyber law. Advances in Consumer Research, 2(6). 10. Yadav, A. (2025). Cyber-crimes and cyber security: Insights into threats and protections. NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies, 10(Special Issue).
Publication Date
8/28/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...